Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de>
Newsgroups: sci.logic
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
 (extra-ordinary)
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 22:39:55 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 20
Message-ID: <vidcbc$18ddr$1@dont-email.me>
References: <31419fde-62b3-46f3-89f6-a48f1fe82bc0@att.net>
 <vi56el$3is82$1@dont-email.me> <vi57p2$3j62u$1@dont-email.me>
 <vi6tu2$3v0dn$3@dont-email.me>
 <bedba0f79694c3adbbcb4eff22a28b9597ea1293@i2pn2.org>
 <vi7uam$5cmb$1@dont-email.me>
 <376546bee4809e20528e0e9481315611ec5c3848@i2pn2.org>
 <vi9n75$hepc$1@dont-email.me>
 <659cb7a16573c854e96c7a982fe8b15397fb1210@i2pn2.org>
 <vi9u2d$ig6a$1@dont-email.me>
 <566c43c9af9113a8654a25c54ff6d60fbe982784@i2pn2.org>
 <via4jv$jk72$1@dont-email.me>
 <b7f357ab699a666d92da2a36021d0c8948232b1f@i2pn2.org>
 <viaaga$jk72$5@dont-email.me>
 <621b95c8deb04df2cb53e3bfa9f3a60e4b84458c@i2pn2.org>
 <d0d39b61-0943-48ba-9971-9c43eebfc1b5@tha.de>
 <85e0893a25e83c8407149ef84012fdfa4c65aa05@i2pn2.org>
 <vichvo$13m17$2@dont-email.me>
 <c1f435672c4e9bbc6a357dcee2f15d6922d48f71@i2pn2.org>
 <vicu6f$16140$1@dont-email.me>
 <371cd0b72537c3d99645164428f3344138ebf0c1@i2pn2.org>
 <vid4k3$1777k$1@dont-email.me>
 <57d2cffb39a8ac1e10c5c1bda1beb0b99956946e@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 22:39:56 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5c34f1366b721b64e39d37d3519800a6";
	logging-data="1324475"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+hdOfBUyQGtCB/dXI8oj67Gf7fGDr+TDo="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:LsOlYPbrd4KozXZ71LABLlDbZ9g=
In-Reply-To: <57d2cffb39a8ac1e10c5c1bda1beb0b99956946e@i2pn2.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2703

On 29.11.2024 21:07, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 11/29/24 2:28 PM, WM wrote:

>> Analysis is no a lie.
> 
> Bad Analysis, like what you do is.

The limit of the infinite sequence 1/9, 1/9, 1/9, ... is 1/9. Nothing is 
clearer than that.

>> No, I am using a very simple and sound rule. If all hats of finite 
>> intervals (0, n] fail to cover more than 1/10, then it is impossible 
>> to cover more than 1/10 of the whole set ℕ because beyond all finite 
>> intervals and all finite n, there is no supply of black hats.
> 
> So, you admit to MAKING UP your rules based on your own ideas

This chain of arguing is irrefutable by consistent thinking.

Regards, WM