| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<viekr7$1kda6$4@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.sys.raspberry-pi Subject: Re: Bookworm on "Raspberry Pi Model B Plus Rev 1.2", OK? Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2024 09:11:03 +0000 Organization: A little, after lunch Lines: 24 Message-ID: <viekr7$1kda6$4@dont-email.me> References: <b0tp1l-9421.ln1@q957.zbmc.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2024 10:11:03 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d61f267e4b5f5f807095ff6f891f9981"; logging-data="1717574"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/BivzXWe4Zbr2a2u7iG912m6COdvkpAqY=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:ShGCjJI1XdT+548edQnjvAKprYM= Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: <b0tp1l-9421.ln1@q957.zbmc.eu> Bytes: 1851 On 29/11/2024 22:49, Chris Green wrote: > I'm currently running Bullseye on a Raspberry Pi Model B Plus Rev 1.2 > but I'd quite like to move to Bookworm if I can. > > It's headless and has a 'lite' installation, it's not doing very much > that pushes its processing power so should be OK from that point of > view. > > I can't quite remember why I installed Bullseye rather than Bookworm, > there must have been some sort of reason but now I can't really see > what that might have been! :-) > Some stuff was pretty different. I installed bookworm because it was new and shiny, Its taken some time to get it stable. But I am beginning to think it will take the strain. -- "The great thing about Glasgow is that if there's a nuclear attack it'll look exactly the same afterwards." Billy Connolly