Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<viekr7$1kda6$4@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.raspberry-pi
Subject: Re: Bookworm on "Raspberry Pi Model B Plus Rev 1.2", OK?
Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2024 09:11:03 +0000
Organization: A little, after lunch
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <viekr7$1kda6$4@dont-email.me>
References: <b0tp1l-9421.ln1@q957.zbmc.eu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2024 10:11:03 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d61f267e4b5f5f807095ff6f891f9981";
	logging-data="1717574"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/BivzXWe4Zbr2a2u7iG912m6COdvkpAqY="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ShGCjJI1XdT+548edQnjvAKprYM=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <b0tp1l-9421.ln1@q957.zbmc.eu>
Bytes: 1851

On 29/11/2024 22:49, Chris Green wrote:
> I'm currently running Bullseye on a Raspberry Pi Model B Plus Rev 1.2
> but I'd quite like to move to Bookworm if I can.
> 
> It's headless and has a 'lite' installation, it's not doing very much
> that pushes its processing power so should be OK from that point of
> view.
> 
> I can't quite remember why I installed Bullseye rather than Bookworm,
> there must have been some sort of reason but now I can't really see
> what that might have been! :-)
> 
Some stuff was pretty different.  I installed bookworm because it was 
new and shiny, Its taken some time to get it stable.

But I am beginning to think it will take the strain.


-- 
"The great thing about Glasgow is that if there's a nuclear attack it'll 
look exactly the same afterwards."

Billy Connolly