Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vig52u$1voo8$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: 1GW (sic) Battery Energy Storage Systems Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2024 23:58:17 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 112 Message-ID: <vig52u$1voo8$2@dont-email.me> References: <vhv3b0$27b8q$2@dont-email.me> <vhvl4l$2a8ot$1@dont-email.me> <vhvpgd$2b49h$1@dont-email.me> <8ar6kjtg3c4h4sj7k3u0ltgvcqn9mcmpln@4ax.com> <vi2dmn$2svqb$1@dont-email.me> <88fakj9gc9rv5t2hpi1m7gc1tutillr4m1@4ax.com> <vieql0$1lk8t$1@dont-email.me> <facmkjdq9714m862op0i27evggs7rls294@4ax.com> <vifilu$1s1cd$1@dont-email.me> <190nkj915n5k38oavqnnc1r1e942efm5uv@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2024 23:54:22 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4da290527ba93d799a52f49301aa8bf8"; logging-data="2089736"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+THcgcYsx4GkY6ZCrT5exv" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0 Cancel-Lock: sha1:d5NAMLT2lCEoa54btcTQ5x8Hrn8= In-Reply-To: <190nkj915n5k38oavqnnc1r1e942efm5uv@4ax.com> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 6811 On 11/30/24 22:44, john larkin wrote: > On Sat, 30 Nov 2024 17:40:08 +0000, Martin Brown > <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> wrote: > >> On 30/11/2024 15:51, john larkin wrote: >>> On Sat, 30 Nov 2024 10:50:07 +0000, Martin Brown >>> <'''newspam'''@nonad.co.uk> wrote: >>> >>>> On 26/11/2024 03:15, john larkin wrote: >>>> >>>>> Having electricity used to be normal. >>>> >>>> UK power supply is generally way more stable than US. >>> >>> How many hours per year is your power out? >> >> Mine personally used to be entirely reliable after they replaced the >> perished 1950's rubber insulated 3 vertical strands LT with modern >> aluminium compound cable wiring with a steel hawser core. Prior to that >> the lights would flicker in storms and burning bits of rubber would fall >> to the ground under mostly bare copper wires as wet strips of old rubber >> and canvas insulation touched them with much arcing and sparking. >> >> Apart from half a day a year for preventative maintenance where they cut >> down overhanging tree branches it was reliable in the old days. Failure >> is usually because someone has driven into a pole. Hazard of above >> ground cabling (which is unusual in the UK apart from rural backwaters). >> >> However, since the latest shower cut back on preventative maintenance we >> got hammered when storm Arwen hit taking down several (rotten) poles. We >> were down for a couple of days but people around me were down for up to >> two weeks (not enough poles and/or people and kit to put them in). Their >> replace on fail policy can't cope with massive systemic failures. Same >> with a couple of inches of snow and UK grinds to a standstill. >> >> In the cities mains supplies are underground and pretty much reliable >> apart from that infamous incident that I referred to. However, in a cold >> winter on a still and cloudy day the margins now are extremely tight at >> a level where they have to pay some bigger industrial users not to use >> power. >> >>> I'd estimate two total here, on avearge, but a pole on our street >>> toppled down recently and that took 5 hours to replace >> >> We had that too in my village. Once a tree fell on it and the steel >> hawser held it but permanently bent all the poles like bananas and the >> other time the milk tanker on sheet ice totalled a pole on one of the >> coldest days of the year (Sunday morning). Isolated random incident so >> the previous power distribution company had us back on by nightfall. >> >> If that happened again today I expect we would get something like : >> "Your call is really important to us ... our office hours are 9-5 please >> call back on Monday with you emergency power outage <naff music>". >> >>> Large-region power failures are very rare here, between major >>> earthquakes. >> >> They are in the UK too. We don't have earthquakes (well we do notice the >> odd one every few years but they are tiny compared to real earthquakes). > > In Louisiana, a good hurricane would take power out for a week in New > Orleans, and a month or so out in the country. Volunteer linemen would > fly in from all over the USA. > > The 1989 quake here was a 6.9, enough to fracture brick and > soft-foundation buildings, and a freeway, and a big part of the Bay > Bridge. Bricks killed some people, but the Oakland freeway collapse > was the nasty one. That bit of freeway had won architectural awards > for the elegance of its delicate supports. We engineering students > used to make fun of the architects. > > I had some plaster walls crack, and a brick chimney collapse. Power > was out for a day or so, so we had a neighborhood ice cream party. A > mag 8 or so would be really bad, horizontal accels around 1G. > > Further up, coast of Washington and Oregon, could be really bad. > > There are still about a billion people in the world without > electricity, which usually means no clean running water, and cooking > over found wood or dung. > > >> >>>> The public consultation was yesterday. It really is 1GW injection power >>>> and 4 hours so a 4GWhr battery farm (40x bigger than the largest system >>>> currently in the UK and being built by a startup with no track record!). >>>> >>>> It will have ~900 container modules of batteries as close together as >>>> they dare (half the US regulation spacing) and in double lines of 50. >>>> >>>> SO that makes me wonder how big is a 1GW transformer operating at 400kV? >>>> And how much does one cost? >>> >>> Big utility transformers are made to order, and that can take years. >>> The hazards there are obvious. >> >> That is what I thought. I'm trying to put bounds on the lead time. I'm >> more impressed with their sales pitch than I expected to be. My back of >> the envelope calculations suggest an air of unreality about their >> claimed/intended GW injection capacity. Availability of supergrid line >> is not in doubt two main corridors run close by. You can light up a >> fluoro tube stood on end under them. Indeed an artist did just that! >> >> https://www.industrytap.com/florescent-bulbs-unplugged-and-shinning-tapping-electromagnetic-fields/1763 > > I wouldn't have suspected that, to have enough field near the ground > from 3-phase lines way above. I can attest that it works. Been there, done that. Jeroen Belleman