| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vihlvk$lpvg$1@solani.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> Newsgroups: sci.logic Subject: Re: Andrej Bauer is a red flag (Was: How to prove this theorem with intuitionistic natural deduction?) Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2024 13:48:53 +0100 Message-ID: <vihlvk$lpvg$1@solani.org> References: <vhgdq0$19evr$1@dont-email.me> <vihfd2$8qss$1@solani.org> <vihkif$2flre$1@dont-email.me> <vihlga$lpqu$1@solani.org> <vihli7$lpqu$2@solani.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2024 12:48:52 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: solani.org; logging-data="714736"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.19 Cancel-Lock: sha1:CIgSjopnVg99Mkj021wNQe+g//Y= X-User-ID: eJwNycEBwCAIA8CVQEiEcVRg/xHa+x6MyredoGMw0bs080Eqr6yYsrlHnGrPIId9opPlPZW1XUL/R/NC3e/6AFyqFcg= In-Reply-To: <vihli7$lpqu$2@solani.org> Bytes: 2800 Lines: 42 One problem I generally see is, that most people are not aware, that an employee has no rights on the stuff he writes for his employer. Standard Rules: - Work for Hire Doctrine: In most jurisdictions, code written by an employee within the scope of their employment is considered a "work for hire," meaning the employer owns the intellectual property (IP) unless otherwise agreed in writing. - Employment Contracts: Most employment agreements explicitly state that any code, inventions, or intellectual property created as part of your job belongs to the employer. - Use of Employer Resources: If an employee uses the employer’s time, tools, or resources to create code, the employer generally owns the resulting work. Exceptions: - Independent Work: If an employee writes code outside working hours, without using company resources, and it’s unrelated to their job, they may retain rights. Some jurisdictions, like California, have laws (e.g., California Labor Code §2870) protecting employees in such cases. - Negotiated Agreements: If the employee has a specific agreement (e.g., consulting or freelance arrangements), ownership terms might differ. So like 90% of the stackoverflow users cannot go into an agreement individually, since they are employed, with stackoverflow in that they would be able to give a license to what they write. Mild Shock schrieb: > Mild Shock schrieb: >> such mechanisms should be a playground >> for infantile developers with a mindset of a 5 year old. > > Corr.: > > such mechanisms should not be a playground > for infantile developers with a mindset of a 5 year old.