Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vii7qf$2m69k$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de>
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Keeping other stuff with addresses (was: What is an N-bit
 machine?)
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2024 17:53:19 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 25
Message-ID: <vii7qf$2m69k$1@dont-email.me>
References: <memo.20241128153105.12904U@jgd.cix.co.uk>
 <20241128185548.000031c9@yahoo.com> <vidtpt$pon$1@gal.iecc.com>
 <2024Nov30.072829@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at>
 <2024Nov30.123536@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at>
 <vieuks$1n5ve$1@dont-email.me>
 <2024Nov30.175756@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at>
 <20241130193206.00005c49@yahoo.com>
 <2024Nov30.190858@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at>
 <20241130202851.00005eca@yahoo.com>
 <2024Dec1.102826@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <vihqbd$2hnrp$1@dont-email.me>
 <86jzcjo1uw.fsf@linuxsc.com>
Injection-Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2024 18:53:20 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="8f687224941a3437d15889ae5c7b6a60";
	logging-data="2824500"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+2T/CgeydUEoNuOdb73xpaEjQ4+7xQ1g4="
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:CtxLNBGOeQIqt7YgjhCKghWlmO8=
Bytes: 2563

Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> schrieb:
> Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> writes:
>
>> I think "ALU can add up to n-bit numbers" is a reasonable definition
>> for an n-bit architecture, which also fits the 16-bit 68000.
>> It does not fit the 360/30, or the Nova (but see de Castro's remark
>> on the latter).
>
> To me, the phrase "n-bit architecture" should depend only on such
> characteristics as are defined by the architecture, and not depend
> on features of a particular implementation.  The 360/30 has a 32-bit
> (or is it 64-bit?) architecture, but only an 8-bit implementation.
>
> If I may add a personal note, it's disappointing that postings in a
> group nominally devoted to computer architecture routinely ignore
> the distinction between architecture and implementation.

I'm well aware of that distinction.

On the other hand, I have right before me a book with the title
"MC68000 16-BIT MICROPROCESSOR User's manual third edition", ISBN
0-13-566695-3 (in paperback).   One may argue that the authors
of that book didn't know what they were writing about (since the
68000 has a 32-bit ISA), but I would try to define the terms in
such a way that this is also included.