Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vii8df$2lh78$6@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Cursitor Doom <cd999666@notformail.com>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: Datasheet-flation?
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2024 18:03:27 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 87
Message-ID: <vii8df$2lh78$6@dont-email.me>
References: <1r3kq3f.13cn5n51xsaszuN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid>
	<vi33un$32jfc$5@dont-email.me>
	<1r3mdr5.1gi0f2v19nz8a6N%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid>
	<v6qbkjhhjup40e98h7dpv16u41efqvh1vs@4ax.com>
	<1r3ni8c.168sxgezxdj08N%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid>
	<vi7kcr$37g9$7@dont-email.me>
	<1r3qa1i.1dqkos811aqhg4N%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid>
	<rf2hkj5bc958njo3b81idk6m0v9g85hgvc@4ax.com> <viatbm$nq0a$1@dont-email.me>
	<1r3s0gc.163cmlaahld2wN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid>
	<j2njkj5ik85infa9mlutq1tnh4eqg238ip@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2024 19:03:28 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="464dfb1d130dd0b9b60f96112dd59238";
	logging-data="2802920"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19ALgkBiUzmLaLW5ZLB88fzmHQwOPz/RCE="
User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:lLPLeIRfsRoaxjRABxMZt18CZr4=
Bytes: 5096

On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 07:23:34 -0800, john larkin wrote:

> On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 08:56:17 +0000, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
> (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:
> 
>>Cursitor Doom <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 07:22:01 -0800, john larkin wrote:
>>> 
>>> > On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 10:36:08 +0000, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
>>> > (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:
>>> > 
>>> >>Cursitor Doom <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 22:27:12 +0000, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
>>> >>> 
>>> >>> > john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote:
>>> >>> > 
>>> >>> >> On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 07:51:04 +0000,
>>> >>> >> liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:
>>> >>> >> 
>>> >>> >> >Cursitor Doom <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
>>> >>> >> >
>>> >>> >> >> On Mon, 25 Nov 2024 10:21:56 +0000, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
>>> >>> >> >> 
>>> >>> >> >> > Cursitor Doom <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
>>> >>> >> >> > 
>>> >>> >> >> >> On Sun, 24 Nov 2024 18:22:22 +0000, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
>>> >>> >> >> >> 
>>> >>> >> >> >> > Cursitor Doom <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
>>> >>> >> >> >> > 
>>> >>> >> >> >> > [...]
>>> >>> >> >> >> >> the English and American "billion" was harmonised many
>>> >>> >> >> >> >> years ago at one thousand million so there's no
>>> >>> >> >> >> >> confusion.
>>> >>> >> >> >> > 
>>> >>> >> >> >> > Can you give a reference for that?  I haven't found
>>> >>> >> >> >> > one.
>>> >>> >> >> >> 
>>> >>> >> >> >> Try this:
>>> >>> >> >> >> https://www.thenakedscientists.com/articles/questions/
why-
>>> are-uk-
>>> >>> and-
>>> >>> >> >> >> american-billions-different
>>> >>> >> >> > 
>>> >>> >> >> > It just repeats the myth but doesn't give a reference.
>>> >>> >> >> 
>>> >>> >> >> It's not a myth. UK and US billions have been harmonized at
>>> >>> >> >> 1,000,000,000 for as long as I can remember now. As I
>>> >>> >> >> recall, it was just done simply via adoption rather than any
>>> >>> >> >> Act of Parliament or Statutory Instrument. IIRC, I think the
>>> >>> >> >> pressure to do so came from the finance industry.
>>> >>> >> >
>>> >>> >> >Do you have a reference that isn't just heresay?
>>> >>> >> 
>>> >>> >> You can go to BBC.com and search for stories with "billions".
>>> >>> >> They obviously mean 1e9.
>>> >>> > 
>>> >>> > That is not evidence that the two have been harmonised, it just
>>> >>> > shows that BBC journalists have adopted American terminology.
>>> >>> > 
>>> >>> > To harmonise two systems requires formal discussion, decision
>>> >>> > and documentation and neither you nor I have found any evidence
>>> >>> > of that.
>>> >>> 
>>> >>> Fine believe whatever delusions you want to believe but it doesn't
>>> >>> change the fact that a UK billion today is one thousand million.
>>> >>> Period.
>>> >>
>>> >>You have still produced no no proof for your original assertion that
>>> >>the UK billion has been harmonised with the US billion, which was
>>> >>the point in question.  Common misusage does not alter the facts.
>>> 
>>> I'm not obliged to provide you with *anything*. The fact that I
>>> informed you what a billion is today was a courtesy extended to you by
>>> my infinite patience as a decent human being.
>>
>>Making a statement does not place you under any absolute obligation to
>>back it up with facts - but a failure to do so lays you open to the
>>suspicion that the statement was false.
> 
> Gosh, how can he live with the shame?

I'll manage. :) OTOH, "Liz" has exhibited extraordinary obtusity IRO this 
very simple matter and will have to live with THAT stain on "her" 
reputation.