| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vii8df$2lh78$6@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Cursitor Doom <cd999666@notformail.com> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: Datasheet-flation? Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2024 18:03:27 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 87 Message-ID: <vii8df$2lh78$6@dont-email.me> References: <1r3kq3f.13cn5n51xsaszuN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> <vi33un$32jfc$5@dont-email.me> <1r3mdr5.1gi0f2v19nz8a6N%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> <v6qbkjhhjup40e98h7dpv16u41efqvh1vs@4ax.com> <1r3ni8c.168sxgezxdj08N%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> <vi7kcr$37g9$7@dont-email.me> <1r3qa1i.1dqkos811aqhg4N%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> <rf2hkj5bc958njo3b81idk6m0v9g85hgvc@4ax.com> <viatbm$nq0a$1@dont-email.me> <1r3s0gc.163cmlaahld2wN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> <j2njkj5ik85infa9mlutq1tnh4eqg238ip@4ax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2024 19:03:28 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="464dfb1d130dd0b9b60f96112dd59238"; logging-data="2802920"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19ALgkBiUzmLaLW5ZLB88fzmHQwOPz/RCE=" User-Agent: Pan/0.149 (Bellevue; 4c157ba) Cancel-Lock: sha1:lLPLeIRfsRoaxjRABxMZt18CZr4= Bytes: 5096 On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 07:23:34 -0800, john larkin wrote: > On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 08:56:17 +0000, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid > (Liz Tuddenham) wrote: > >>Cursitor Doom <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 07:22:01 -0800, john larkin wrote: >>> >>> > On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 10:36:08 +0000, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid >>> > (Liz Tuddenham) wrote: >>> > >>> >>Cursitor Doom <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote: >>> >> >>> >>> On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 22:27:12 +0000, Liz Tuddenham wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> > john larkin <JL@gct.com> wrote: >>> >>> > >>> >>> >> On Tue, 26 Nov 2024 07:51:04 +0000, >>> >>> >> liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) wrote: >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >Cursitor Doom <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> >> On Mon, 25 Nov 2024 10:21:56 +0000, Liz Tuddenham wrote: >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> > Cursitor Doom <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >> >> > >>> >>> >> >> >> On Sun, 24 Nov 2024 18:22:22 +0000, Liz Tuddenham wrote: >>> >>> >> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >> > Cursitor Doom <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >> >> >> > >>> >>> >> >> >> > [...] >>> >>> >> >> >> >> the English and American "billion" was harmonised many >>> >>> >> >> >> >> years ago at one thousand million so there's no >>> >>> >> >> >> >> confusion. >>> >>> >> >> >> > >>> >>> >> >> >> > Can you give a reference for that? I haven't found >>> >>> >> >> >> > one. >>> >>> >> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> >> Try this: >>> >>> >> >> >> https://www.thenakedscientists.com/articles/questions/ why- >>> are-uk- >>> >>> and- >>> >>> >> >> >> american-billions-different >>> >>> >> >> > >>> >>> >> >> > It just repeats the myth but doesn't give a reference. >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >> >> It's not a myth. UK and US billions have been harmonized at >>> >>> >> >> 1,000,000,000 for as long as I can remember now. As I >>> >>> >> >> recall, it was just done simply via adoption rather than any >>> >>> >> >> Act of Parliament or Statutory Instrument. IIRC, I think the >>> >>> >> >> pressure to do so came from the finance industry. >>> >>> >> > >>> >>> >> >Do you have a reference that isn't just heresay? >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> You can go to BBC.com and search for stories with "billions". >>> >>> >> They obviously mean 1e9. >>> >>> > >>> >>> > That is not evidence that the two have been harmonised, it just >>> >>> > shows that BBC journalists have adopted American terminology. >>> >>> > >>> >>> > To harmonise two systems requires formal discussion, decision >>> >>> > and documentation and neither you nor I have found any evidence >>> >>> > of that. >>> >>> >>> >>> Fine believe whatever delusions you want to believe but it doesn't >>> >>> change the fact that a UK billion today is one thousand million. >>> >>> Period. >>> >> >>> >>You have still produced no no proof for your original assertion that >>> >>the UK billion has been harmonised with the US billion, which was >>> >>the point in question. Common misusage does not alter the facts. >>> >>> I'm not obliged to provide you with *anything*. The fact that I >>> informed you what a billion is today was a courtesy extended to you by >>> my infinite patience as a decent human being. >> >>Making a statement does not place you under any absolute obligation to >>back it up with facts - but a failure to do so lays you open to the >>suspicion that the statement was false. > > Gosh, how can he live with the shame? I'll manage. :) OTOH, "Liz" has exhibited extraordinary obtusity IRO this very simple matter and will have to live with THAT stain on "her" reputation.