Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vikfnb$3c296$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Jeroen Belleman <jeroen@nospam.please>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: Datasheet-flation?
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2024 15:24:23 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 48
Message-ID: <vikfnb$3c296$2@dont-email.me>
References: <1r3hwoc.n2yk211k1an2yN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid>
 <vhu82r$23cv5$1@dont-email.me>
 <1r3ix4d.1yypjir8hoviuN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid>
 <vhv4k3$27kpu$2@dont-email.me> <vhvpl2$2ar1i$5@dont-email.me>
 <1r3jhb1.ks7h3uj4pk00N%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid>
 <vic61m$1a5ji$3@gonzo.revmaps.no-ip.org>
 <1r3sfq2.1p1qdnk1d8sh9wN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid>
 <cvvo1lx4lu.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <victje$1644r$1@dont-email.me>
 <v5sp1lxv75.ln2@Telcontar.valinor>
 <k8frkjpafquuqm8dde4ptgcocog4kqvool@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2024 15:20:27 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5c0b9d5792eeceaa0e80ed531d9bb87c";
	logging-data="3541286"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/dgQksAAOvoCvzuExHd5bD"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.13.0
Cancel-Lock: sha1:b9nNuGSnta0lLxFz1QS9/LqxGJ0=
In-Reply-To: <k8frkjpafquuqm8dde4ptgcocog4kqvool@4ax.com>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3259

On 12/2/24 15:00, john larkin wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 23:35:11 +0100, "Carlos E.R."
> <robin_listas@es.invalid> wrote:
> 
>> On 2024-11-29 18:32, Jeroen Belleman wrote:
>>> On 11/29/24 15:33, Carlos E.R. wrote:
>>>> On 2024-11-29 15:22, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
>>>>> Jasen Betts <usenet@revmaps.no-ip.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2024-11-24, Liz Tuddenham <liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>> Cursitor Doom <cd999666@notformail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>>>> the English and American "billion" was
>>>>>>>> harmonised many years ago at one thousand million so there's no
>>>>>>>> confusion.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can you give a reference for that?  I haven't found one.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN04440/
>>>>>> SN04440.pdf
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you, that clarifies the situation.  The English Billion still
>>>>> exists but in 1957 British Ministers were told to use the American
>>>>> meaning as it was considered "International" by the then Prime Minister.
>>>>>
>>>>> Obviously it cannot be completely international if there are still
>>>>> countries using it to mean Bi-million nowadays.
>>>>
>>>> And languages. Spanish, in Spain at least, a billion is a million
>>>> million. So one has to be careful when translating.
>>>>
>>>
>>> All this abundantly demonstrates that we're better off using the
>>> metric prefixes instead. It'll be next to impossible to make
>>> politicians and finance accept that though...
>>
>> Right!
>>
>> Or notations like 5*10^9  or 5E9 (calculators did this. Do they still
>> do? 5E9 is very simple)
> 
> 10^9 = 1e10 in some places.
> 

What??? Where?

Jeroen Belleman