Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Two points
Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2024 23:25:46 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <vilflq$3kicc$4@dont-email.me>
References: <lqu2q4Fa9h6U1@mid.individual.net> <vidd61$18mjb$5@dont-email.me>
	<lr54oiFfnf9U1@mid.individual.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2024 00:25:46 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c96be26192a45ce8d8c08f341d719685";
	logging-data="3819916"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19wVjOsgOfFO1aghpP7Wool"
User-Agent: Pan/0.161 (Chasiv Yar; )
Cancel-Lock: sha1:mKRQ8Hq+gs4kGzexTHjo8I2iRUU=
Bytes: 1645

On 2 Dec 2024 07:09:07 GMT, vallor wrote:

> On Fri, 29 Nov 2024 21:54:09 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro
> <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote in <vidd61$18mjb$5@dont-email.me>:
> 
>> On 29 Nov 2024 14:52:53 GMT, vallor wrote:
>> 
>>> So we have a Mac Studio now, which is a low-end UNIX workstation.
>> 
>> Is that ARM-based? Is it as expandable as the old x86-based Mac Pro? If
>> no, then don’t call it a “workstation”.
> 
> It's very expandable.  It uses a technology that is basically "external
> PCIE" -- only that's not what it's called, it's called "Thunderbolt".

“External expandability” -- that’s a laugh.