| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vilpu5$3mpbn$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho Subject: Re: Ping Your Name Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 15:20:53 +1300 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 70 Message-ID: <vilpu5$3mpbn$1@dont-email.me> References: <vik6kk$3a5bg$1@dont-email.me> <vilooq$3mbfh$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2024 03:20:54 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9bb92015a0dfcc8d0cb2b940b25446cd"; logging-data="3892599"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+ABlhUzjq+Pw1/nje0CN93vJk7hOyvpYs=" User-Agent: Unison/2.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:qxeX+zhhedvkZBEfscEig4bHUM8= Bytes: 4373 On 2024-12-03 02:00:55 +0000, Idlehands said: > On 2024-12-02 11:02 a.m., The Last Doctor wrote: >> On 02/12/2024 15:43, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote: >>> In article <vikk6g$3dn0r$1@dont-email.me>, >>> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote: >>>> On 02/12/2024 15:07, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote: >>>>> In article <vikeig$3c6m6$1@dont-email.me>, >>>>> The Last Doctor <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote: >>>>>> On 02/12/2024 13:49, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote: >>>>>>> In article <vik6kk$3a5bg$1@dont-email.me>, >>>>>>> Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote: >>>>>>>> This afternoon I caught up on the 'lastest' "The Brokenwood Mysteries" >>>>>>>> episode, "Brokenwood-o-saurus" https://www.imdb.com/ >>>>>>>> title/tt31272072/?ref_=ttep_ep1 which had me thinking about this group >>>>>>>> as the story was about a very religious paleontologist ..... isn't that >>>>>>>> a contradiction?? A Person who believes The Earth came into existance >>>>>>>> just 10,000 years ago (in the program) but at the same time believes >>>>>>>> dinosaurs existed a hundred million years ago. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sort of like our very own 'religious' nut who believes God created >>>>>>>> Earth (alone) 6,000 years ago but accepts there could be intelligent >>>>>>>> lifeforms from other planets .... that weren't made by God!! ;-P >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Daniel >>>>>>> >>>>>>> uAnd then there are Creationist scientists. >>>>>> >>>>>> No, Dave, there really aren't, except in a "first cause old Earth >>>>>> Creationist" sense. >>>>>> >>>>>> Unless you are stretching the definition of "science". I bet you won't >>>>>> find any New Earth Creationist biologists, physicists, astronomers, >>>>>> geologists, or biochemists, for example. >>>>>> >>>>>> No-one expert in any science that would be relevant to supporting >>>>>> Creationism is a New Earth Creationist because it's self evidently >>>>>> false given the vast weight of scientific evidence against it and the >>>>>> complete and utter absence of even one point of evidence that would >>>>>> support it. >>>>> >>>>> Sounds like anti-Christian bigotry to me. >>>> >>>> There are a great many scientists who are Christian. There are >>>> vanishingly few who are Biblical Literalists or New Age Creationists >>>> because anyone with a critical mind and even modest intelligence knows >>>> that these concepts are just plain wrong and run counter to reason and >>>> to a faith that can ve credible. So only people who are prepared to lie >>>> to themselves and the people around them constantly could practise >>>> honest science while holding beliefs thatrun counter to fact, to >>>> reality, and to their scientific knowledge. >>>> >>>> It isn't bigotry to recognise lies and stupidity, Dave, and it isn't >>>> anti-Christian - it's just common sense and having an honest faith. >>> >>> Common sense would dictate Genesis is correct and Creation science is a >>> REAL science. >> >> No, Dave, it really, really doesn't and it really, really isn't. > > I was going to dismiss "Creation Science" as another binky fantasy but > a quick Google search reveals the number of deluded folks who are > buying into this nonsense. > > As for "Genesis", which story is the real one binky, Genesis 1 or 2? Not to mention the bits the church leaders probably edited out simply because they didn't like them.