Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vilpu5$3mpbn$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Your Name <YourName@YourISP.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.drwho
Subject: Re: Ping Your Name
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 15:20:53 +1300
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 70
Message-ID: <vilpu5$3mpbn$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vik6kk$3a5bg$1@dont-email.me> <vilooq$3mbfh$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2024 03:20:54 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9bb92015a0dfcc8d0cb2b940b25446cd";
	logging-data="3892599"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+ABlhUzjq+Pw1/nje0CN93vJk7hOyvpYs="
User-Agent: Unison/2.2
Cancel-Lock: sha1:qxeX+zhhedvkZBEfscEig4bHUM8=
Bytes: 4373

On 2024-12-03 02:00:55 +0000, Idlehands said:
> On 2024-12-02 11:02 a.m., The Last Doctor wrote:
>> On 02/12/2024 15:43, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>>> In article <vikk6g$3dn0r$1@dont-email.me>,
>>> The Last Doctor  <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>>> On 02/12/2024 15:07, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>>>>> In article <vikeig$3c6m6$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>> The Last Doctor  <mike@xenocyte.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 02/12/2024 13:49, doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca wrote:
>>>>>>> In article <vik6kk$3a5bg$1@dont-email.me>,
>>>>>>> Daniel70  <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>> This afternoon I caught up on the 'lastest' "The Brokenwood Mysteries" 
>>>>>>>> episode, "Brokenwood-o-saurus" https://www.imdb.com/ 
>>>>>>>> title/tt31272072/?ref_=ttep_ep1 which had me thinking about this group 
>>>>>>>> as the story was about a very religious paleontologist ..... isn't that 
>>>>>>>> a contradiction?? A Person who believes The Earth came into existance 
>>>>>>>> just 10,000 years ago (in the program) but at the same time believes 
>>>>>>>> dinosaurs existed a hundred million years ago.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Sort of like our very own 'religious' nut who believes God created 
>>>>>>>> Earth (alone) 6,000 years ago but accepts there could be intelligent 
>>>>>>>> lifeforms from other planets .... that weren't made by God!! ;-P
>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>> Daniel
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> uAnd then there are Creationist scientists.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> No, Dave, there really aren't, except in a "first cause old Earth
>>>>>> Creationist" sense.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Unless you are stretching the definition of "science". I bet you won't 
>>>>>> find any New Earth Creationist biologists, physicists, astronomers, 
>>>>>> geologists, or biochemists, for example.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> No-one expert in any science that would be relevant to supporting
>>>>>> Creationism is a New Earth Creationist because it's self evidently 
>>>>>> false given the vast weight of scientific evidence against it and the 
>>>>>> complete and utter absence of even one point of evidence that would 
>>>>>> support it.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sounds like anti-Christian bigotry to me.
>>>> 
>>>> There are a great many scientists who are Christian. There are 
>>>> vanishingly few who are Biblical Literalists or New Age Creationists 
>>>> because anyone with a critical mind and even modest intelligence knows 
>>>> that these concepts are just plain wrong and run counter to reason and 
>>>> to a faith that can ve credible. So only people who are prepared to lie 
>>>> to themselves and the people around them constantly could practise 
>>>> honest science while holding beliefs thatrun counter to fact, to 
>>>> reality, and to their scientific knowledge.
>>>> 
>>>> It isn't bigotry to recognise lies and stupidity, Dave, and it isn't
>>>> anti-Christian - it's just common sense and having an honest faith.
>>> 
>>> Common sense would dictate Genesis is correct and Creation science is a 
>>> REAL science.
>> 
>> No, Dave, it really, really doesn't and it really, really isn't.
> 
> I was going to dismiss "Creation Science" as another binky fantasy but 
> a quick Google search reveals the number of deluded folks who are 
> buying into this nonsense.
> 
> As for "Genesis", which story is the real one binky, Genesis 1 or 2?

Not to mention the bits the church leaders probably edited out simply 
because they didn't like them.