Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Joy of this, Joy of that
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 10:51:48 +0000
Organization: A little, after lunch
Lines: 40
Message-ID: <vimns4$gck$7@dont-email.me>
References: <vhigot$1uakf$1@dont-email.me> <vhsdhp$1m6qu$2@dont-email.me>
 <X4KcnQQzFNko49_6nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <vhvdmo$2900d$3@dont-email.me> <vhvdqu$28p7r$7@dont-email.me>
 <vhvm34$2aerk$2@dont-email.me>
 <1b166410-ecc1-f9e5-7218-cde9618f4686@example.net>
 <lqi4odFdu06U3@mid.individual.net>
 <77840736-c143-e896-5da0-d0afae4915ed@example.net>
 <vi1p3r$2oh05$7@dont-email.me> <vi2rd9$318ah$5@dont-email.me>
 <8xidnV6HZos6I9v6nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <vi85j6$6ct6$7@dont-email.me>
 <eOqcnUPJTdkXetr6nZ2dnZfqnPqdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <lqqeduFo61aU3@mid.individual.net>
 <vRWdna-Hi8nZv9X6nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <vianoa$na9e$3@dont-email.me>
 <5cKdndZFvPPeD9T6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <lque62Fdis3U1@mid.individual.net>
 <9PucnWdylb1dAtf6nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <lqvr3uFkditU1@mid.individual.net>
 <8QSdnSVUsd2Rt9H6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <lr42lnFarjpU1@mid.individual.net>
 <rXudnavJVIaWDdP6nZ2dnZfqnPcAAAAA@earthlink.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2024 11:51:49 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0a834c8af5841240b0bbb83bed56683d";
	logging-data="16788"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+qZy6gP/VNo5xuLubcLjRuQ0fdy3WFz0g="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:mldb4uMPswcaH+w7lz9Cmm7kJp4=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <rXudnavJVIaWDdP6nZ2dnZfqnPcAAAAA@earthlink.com>
Bytes: 3522

On 03/12/2024 04:58, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
> On 12/1/24 4:27 PM, rbowman wrote:
>> On Sun, 1 Dec 2024 04:19:07 -0500, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote:
>>
>>>     Well, Apache isn't HORRIBLE. It's also well-refined and
>>>     well-supported. NOT to be sneezed at. Newer stuff is smaller/faster
>>>     ... but what do you lose ?
>>
>> https://dev.to/emiliosp/nodejs-vs-apache-performance-battle-for-the-
>> conquest-of-my-5c4n
>>
>> I haven't noticed that I lost anything using node.js. nginx is also 
>> taking
>> market share from Apache.
> 
> 
>    The alts ARE getting much better. Didn't start out
>    like that however.

I think at least one did. Apache worked but it used memory like no 
tomorrow. There was another one, but I cannot remember its name - that 
was very compatible but less memory and faster.

Maybe that WAS Nginx


-- 
“it should be clear by now to everyone that activist environmentalism 
(or environmental activism) is becoming a general ideology about humans, 
about their freedom, about the relationship between the individual and 
the state, and about the manipulation of people under the guise of a 
'noble' idea. It is not an honest pursuit of 'sustainable development,' 
a matter of elementary environmental protection, or a search for 
rational mechanisms designed to achieve a healthy environment. Yet 
things do occur that make you shake your head and remind yourself that 
you live neither in Joseph Stalin’s Communist era, nor in the Orwellian 
utopia of 1984.”

Vaclav Klaus