Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android,comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on
 Texting
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 09:39:50 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 59
Message-ID: <vinfp6$7c23$1@dont-email.me>
References: <viaov1$nh0h$2@dont-email.me>
 <071ikjds6op23p9b1vk6lg4l5379t7mv9l@4ax.com> <vib1e0$ouvk$1@dont-email.me>
 <rm3ikjdrk2c6m5ia2mcj32qrf2odp92dua@4ax.com> <vibb80$s01m$1@dont-email.me>
 <vicute$12qd5$2@dont-email.me> <j0gkkj1r7k5eqimh79o7vcc7sc4abro18j@4ax.com>
 <vieut7$1msjk$2@dont-email.me> <m7pmkj93qgktgha1a2ci6u4rhvvs6r2qk6@4ax.com>
 <vifpde$1tf8h$1@dont-email.me> <nermkj52tvp85j0gupdim58b315od66fd1@4ax.com>
 <vigakc$21500$1@dont-email.me> <pr2qkj1aqnm291jk8ikkgq1ah7gp6pugi9@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2024 18:39:51 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="730a43e77922027b4a65f268bc7ab0d7";
	logging-data="241731"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/18Kc/D/tp9hlyC9SrDVtZca0myLq5Wa0="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Iuyz2K8Tfxd2NrtKwVpDKQ9tK8Y=
In-Reply-To: <pr2qkj1aqnm291jk8ikkgq1ah7gp6pugi9@4ax.com>
Content-Language: en-CA
Bytes: 4007

On 2024-12-01 17:23, Joel wrote:
> -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
> 
>> Joel>>>>
>>>>>> It doesn't suck for an external drive, using an external
>>>>>> drive sucks as a continuous solution.
>>
>> Alan>>> Why?
>>
>> Joel>>
>>>> If I want two drives, I want them both internal.  However, since I
>>>> have no wish to dual-boot Winblows, I don't need a second drive.
>>
>> Alan>
>>> 1. That's not an answer. That's saying the same thing by different
>>> words.
>>>
>>> 2. Having two drives has nothing to do with whether or not you are
>>> dual-booting.
>>
>> My observation is that it depends on what the workflow use case needs
>> are for if two drives are better (or needed) vs one, as well as if these
>> are better (or worse) served by both being internal vs
>> internal/external, etc.
>>
>> For example, contemplate the baseline 3-2-1 data backup strategy of
>> having three backup copies at all times, preferably over two mediums,
>> and having at least one be remote site located.  FYI, 'remote site' is
>> to mitigate single point failure risks such as a home fire destroying
>> everything. Ditto lightning strikes if all are continuously plugged in.
>>
>> So for a home user, what's the hardware solution for rotating a backup
>> copy to a remote site?  The main simple options today are either to:
>>
>> a) pay $$ to rent Cloud storage,
>> or
>> b) an external hard drive: unplug and sneaker-net it to the remote.
>>
>>
>> A common trade-off on option (a) is one's ISP:  bandwidth speed
>> limitations and monthly quota restrictions may interfere.
>>
>> For option (b), if you want to have an internal bay instead of an
>> external HDD, that's fine ... but you're now looking at having to shut
>> down your entire PC, opening the case, and yanking out this internally
>> installed drive for each transfer to remote.  How frequently will
>> depends on your risk tolerance...a common best practice IIRC is weekly.
> 
> 
> In fairness, since a Mac system is unlikely to dual-boot, compared to
> a PC, the hardware from Apple isn't totally terrible.  My machine
> isn't really different, it just divides the SoC into different parts.
> It's just that if I had some need for Windows, I would be able to
> install it comfortably, or if I wanted to have a second modern drive
> for some other reason.
> 

Why are you focused on dual booting as the only reason to have more than 
one drive?