| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vinqol$bdgc$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com> Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone Subject: Re: Employee lawsuit accuses Apple of spying on its workers Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 20:47:17 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 28 Message-ID: <vinqol$bdgc$1@dont-email.me> References: <xn0ou47jq5kzp4e003@reader443.eternal-september.org> <vin608$ok9g$1@solani.org> <xn0ou4b1l5prgto006@reader443.eternal-september.org> <vinfv0$7l5a$1@dont-email.me> <xn0ou4fpk5w31yd008@reader443.eternal-september.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2024 21:47:27 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ccd342508619655b5462e44e7d1f9b61"; logging-data="374284"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/GHGU5F+I0mrMdSiFukO9K8Al82lzBf7E=" User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch) Cancel-Lock: sha1:3pqFkkuJgAtBN2YYAlW1sXT4ywU= sha1:lYD6Cw58ATujknAGXXWf6gyBWeU= badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote: > Chris wrote: > >> What's your opinion? Given you thought it was worthwhile to share. > > I carry two iPhones precisely for this reason. One is a company phone > and the other a personal phone. Once we were informed company phones > would be monitored and certain apps would be restricted from being > installed, I knew it was time to get my own phone. If it's genuinely a company phone - i.e. bought and provided by them - then they're entitled to restrict use as they see fit. > My company phone > has nothing on it except for iOS and Microsoft Office suite. I also > have two Apple IDs, a personal and a work one. > > If the Apple employees don't want their personal lives monitored they > can carry two phones too. The part of the article which concerns me is > this and I don't quite understand the reasoning behind it: > "To evade Apple’s surveillance, employees could use a work-owned device > and use a separate iCloud account only for work, but the suit says the > company “actively discourages” work-only iCloud accounts." I mean it's a suit. Anyone can allege what they want in a suit even things that don't make sense. I wouldn't put any weight on it.