Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vinqol$bdgc$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Chris <ithinkiam@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone
Subject: Re: Employee lawsuit accuses Apple of spying on its workers
Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 20:47:17 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <vinqol$bdgc$1@dont-email.me>
References: <xn0ou47jq5kzp4e003@reader443.eternal-september.org>
 <vin608$ok9g$1@solani.org>
 <xn0ou4b1l5prgto006@reader443.eternal-september.org>
 <vinfv0$7l5a$1@dont-email.me>
 <xn0ou4fpk5w31yd008@reader443.eternal-september.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2024 21:47:27 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ccd342508619655b5462e44e7d1f9b61";
	logging-data="374284"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/GHGU5F+I0mrMdSiFukO9K8Al82lzBf7E="
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:3pqFkkuJgAtBN2YYAlW1sXT4ywU=
	sha1:lYD6Cw58ATujknAGXXWf6gyBWeU=

badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
> Chris wrote:
> 
>> What's your opinion? Given you thought it was worthwhile to share. 
> 
> I carry two iPhones precisely for this reason.  One is a company phone
> and the other a personal phone.  Once we were informed company phones
> would be monitored and certain apps would be restricted from being
> installed, I knew it was time to get my own phone.  

If it's genuinely a company phone - i.e. bought and provided by them - then
they're entitled to restrict use as they see fit. 

> My company phone
> has nothing on it except for iOS and Microsoft Office suite.  I also
> have two Apple IDs, a personal and a work one.
> 
> If the Apple employees don't want their personal lives monitored they
> can carry two phones too.  The part of the article which concerns me is
> this and I don't quite understand the reasoning behind it:
> "To evade Apple’s surveillance, employees could use a work-owned device
> and use a separate iCloud account only for work, but the suit says the
> company “actively discourages” work-only iCloud accounts."

I mean it's a suit. Anyone can allege what they want in a suit even things
that don't make sense. I wouldn't put any weight on it.