Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vioehv$g4fe$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: JAB <here@is.invalid> Newsgroups: misc.news.internet.discuss Subject: Re: The Onion just bought Alex Jones' Infowars Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2024 20:25:03 -0600 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 22 Message-ID: <vioehv$g4fe$1@dont-email.me> References: <vh6bi5$33oka$1@dont-email.me> <673824be$4$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <vhbijv$aadq$1@dont-email.me> <67399c4e$0$3620715$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <vii52c$2l6pb$1@dont-email.me> <s0rcyibt96x.fsf@tilde.club> <vij4jb$2u90f$1@dont-email.me> <s0r8qsxtsw3.fsf@tilde.club> <vim34u$3s7di$1@dont-email.me> <s0r1pyotesd.fsf@tilde.club> Reply-To: JAB <here@is.invalid> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 04 Dec 2024 03:25:04 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="25a3a89d61f494bc2da86921bc2f6995"; logging-data="528878"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/mrZ8cS2G4OgXpf7xizskK" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 Cancel-Lock: sha1:LeYtAD+OHdgwmsVXMPiZdFnDjN8= Bytes: 2118 On Wed, 04 Dec 24 01:32:05 UTC, "W. Greenhouse" <wgreenhouse@tilde.club> wrote: >X's interpretation of its shrinkwrap EULA that nobody reads > might actually pass muster. "But the precedent this case sets could expand the power of social media companies, or hurt them." Ben Bentzin with the University of Texas at Austin // social media accounts, which Musk argues isn't Infowars' to sell. // TOS explicitly states that X Corp.'s consent //is required for any assignment, sale or transfer of an account. Previous court cases, Yes: "even if the agreement expressly prohibits assignment or is silent on the issue of assignment. " SCOTUS - The Supreme Court usually only hears cases that are considered to have national significance, or that could harmonize conflicting decisions from lower courts. Stay tuned....historically, the state is supreme....