Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: HHH(DDD) computes the mapping from its input to HHH emulating
 itself emulating DDD
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2024 19:41:27 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 54
Message-ID: <vir0c7$17d36$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vhdd32$oq0l$1@dont-email.me>
 <GcudnQRbD7HyPNv6nZ2dnZfqlJ-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <vi72fe$dbk$1@dont-email.me>
 <vi76pj$106j$2@dont-email.me>
 <db87472521a4e553e992c6933a235dec24fb002f@i2pn2.org>
 <vi8g7t$85ij$1@dont-email.me>
 <ee397fde844b6e8f2266885eb1b657ad4da768f8@i2pn2.org>
 <via50f$ju6v$1@dont-email.me>
 <349430b1223591beb2ebea42b5f3a9e64ea8d795@i2pn2.org>
 <via6qe$ju6v$5@dont-email.me>
 <f4f759fcc2f0b701a91e38062c25d16534e470af@i2pn2.org>
 <via804$kfnn$1@dont-email.me>
 <39d1fae0d0e03ceb82a6a7c722581d5e84d4998f@i2pn2.org>
 <via9kk$kpf2$1@dont-email.me>
 <6f73ca664f7017ea34651a485a4bd3602e9cbe57@i2pn2.org>
 <vilrih$3n2q7$2@dont-email.me>
 <b961b7e79a85fcb3bbd058930fef41e582f7acdd@i2pn2.org>
 <vio31i$dg23$1@dont-email.me>
 <4ccc2cbecfd0e6befd031ed394f1262edd021822@i2pn2.org>
 <viposd$u16a$1@dont-email.me>
 <dd3385b7f379281e5d476701f96e30538ea85802@i2pn2.org>
 <viqua6$16uvh$1@dont-email.me>
 <3d80e95768bf6260168865530aaad3591aa03fda@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2024 02:41:28 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="82d763d7392223528bd18341fe8d5ce7";
	logging-data="1291366"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18IjS8HdhWq4EBmePs0M3Y0"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:y+47AXTQQB7KAtS+jcGUstmXJlk=
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
In-Reply-To: <3d80e95768bf6260168865530aaad3591aa03fda@i2pn2.org>
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 241204-6, 12/4/2024), Outbound message
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 4001

On 12/4/2024 7:31 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 12/4/24 8:06 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 12/4/2024 6:11 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 12/4/24 9:27 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 12/3/2024 5:39 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>> On 12/3/24 6:08 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>> On 12/3/2024 3:03 AM, joes wrote:
>>>>>>> Am Mon, 02 Dec 2024 20:48:49 -0600 schrieb olcott:
>>>>>>>> On 11/28/2024 1:48 PM, joes wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You said:
>>>>>>>>   >>> HHH can't simulate itself.
>>>>>>>> That is WRONG !!!
>>>>>>>> HHH DOES EMULATE ITSELF PROVING THAT IT CAN EMULATE ITSELF.
>>>>>>> We know that HHH halts. It doesn't simulate itself halting.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please try and explain how you are not dishonest what you
>>>>>> try to change the subject from my rebuttal of your statement:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  >>> HHH can't simulate itself.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That HHH does emulate itself emulating DDD proves
>>>>>> THAT IT CAN DO THIS.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> But only if your think that wrong answer can be right.
>>>>
>>>> I did not mention anything about answers my entire
>>>> scope is that HHH does emulate itself emulating DDD
>>>> thus conclusively proving that HHH can emulated itself
>>>> emulating DDD.
>>>>
>>>> Whenever you go out-of-scope like this it surely
>>>> seems dishonest to me.
>>>>
>>>
>>> But the behaivor that HHH shows that it has *IS* an "answer",
>>
>> DDD emulated by any HHH according to the semantics of
>> the x86 language cannot possibly reach its "ret" instruction
>> whether HHH aborts this emulation after N steps or never aborts.
>>
>>
> 
> Just a nonsense sentence, since HHH can't emulate HHH as it isn't given 
> it, 

Why do you have to keep fucking lying about this?
I could die on the operating table in two weeks!

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer