Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vir66v$18j9e$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: John Oliver's Lies are Finally EXPOSED by a 14 Year Old Girl
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2024 22:21:02 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 80
Message-ID: <vir66v$18j9e$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vipidf$rssd$4@dont-email.me> <viqajv$127ar$2@dont-email.me>
 <viqeto$138p3$1@dont-email.me> <viqhdr$l72d$5@dont-email.me>
 <pli1ljlh32k43014vbigv0l8rnro7m5ncb@4ax.com> <viqjep$143ls$1@dont-email.me>
 <viqmfr$14o5c$1@dont-email.me> <viqqrf$169ep$1@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2024 04:21:05 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="aeca84ca585629f3d03343350b9d06e5";
	logging-data="1330478"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19qe8hnWnXEs9SqRgKPhL7hLuHQ+hDNcMU="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ahgm+lgyQHxDRMEf0J37aF4Nst4=
In-Reply-To: <viqqrf$169ep$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 4357

On 12/4/2024 7:06 PM, Rhino wrote:
> On 2024-12-04 5:52 PM, moviePig wrote:
>> On 12/4/2024 5:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>> On Dec 4, 2024 at 1:34:15 PM PST, "shawn" 
>>> <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 4 Dec 2024 16:26:18 -0500, Rhino
>>>> <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2024-12-04 3:43 PM, moviePig wrote:
>>>>>>   On 12/4/2024 2:30 PM, BTR1701 wrote:
>>>>>>>   On Dec 4, 2024 at 1:30:43 AM PST, "Ubiquitous" 
>>>>>>> <weberm@polaris.net>
>>>>>>>   wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   A High School athlete gave a speech, which proves just how 
>>>>>>>> wrong John
>>>>>>>>   Oliver was.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   https://youtu.be/Gj8LTs-tUSI?si=DWJMYU65CAWjEHxH
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   The "it's really not that common so we shouldn't worry about it"
>>>>>>>   excuse is particularly fucked up.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   How many young girls need to suffer injuries before we're 
>>>>>>> allowed to care
>>>>>>>   about it, John?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   The United Nations put our a report a few weeks ago that said 
>>>>>>> in the
>>>>>>>   last two
>>>>>>>   years, over 600 medals in various competitions had been awarded 
>>>>>>> to troons
>>>>>>>   competing as women. That's 600 women who otherwise would have 
>>>>>>> won a
>>>>>>>   championship and who were denied the opportunity by a dude in a 
>>>>>>> skirt.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   Is 600 enough for us to care, John? Or does it need to be 1000? 
>>>>>>> Maybe
>>>>>>>   10,000?
>>>>>>>   What's the number above which John Oliver and the rest of the 
>>>>>>> lunatic
>>>>>>>   wokies will allow us to care about this bullshit?
>>>>>>   How unfortunate that Oliver's show just began its seasonal 
>>>>>> hiatus...
>>>>> The only thing unfortunate about it is that the hiatus is seasonal,
>>>>> rather than permanent.
>>>>
>>>> I agree. The show should permanently on air, year round. Great idea.
>>>
>>> Not sure why Oliver's show being on hiatus is even relevant to what I 
>>> wrote in
>>> the first place, but such are the mysteries of moviePig.
>>
>> Your video specifically attacks Oliver, and would, I'm guessing, be 
>> summarily dealt with if it came to his attention. 
> 
> I'm sure he deals with each and every criticism of his show 
> individually, regardless of the critic, including people who say things 
> on Usenet....
> 
>> In the meantime, Oliver claims that the frequency of such upstart 
>> transsexual incursions is "vanishingly small", which your video 
>> conspicuously doesn't refute. 
> 
> The number of genocides Adolf Hitler initiated is also vanishingly small 
> - two (counting the Jews and the gypsies) - so I guess that makes him 
> okay too then?
> 
>> Personally, *I* remain open to any thoughtful analysis more 
>> comprehensive than a tearful teen learning some facts about "fairness".
>>
> And who would satisfy you as being a fair analyst if an actual living 
> breathing victim doesn't meet your criteria?

Gosh, maybe someone who's in touch with the issue's several sides?