| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vir66v$18j9e$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: John Oliver's Lies are Finally EXPOSED by a 14 Year Old Girl Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2024 22:21:02 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 80 Message-ID: <vir66v$18j9e$1@dont-email.me> References: <vipidf$rssd$4@dont-email.me> <viqajv$127ar$2@dont-email.me> <viqeto$138p3$1@dont-email.me> <viqhdr$l72d$5@dont-email.me> <pli1ljlh32k43014vbigv0l8rnro7m5ncb@4ax.com> <viqjep$143ls$1@dont-email.me> <viqmfr$14o5c$1@dont-email.me> <viqqrf$169ep$1@dont-email.me> Reply-To: nobody@nowhere.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2024 04:21:05 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="aeca84ca585629f3d03343350b9d06e5"; logging-data="1330478"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19qe8hnWnXEs9SqRgKPhL7hLuHQ+hDNcMU=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:ahgm+lgyQHxDRMEf0J37aF4Nst4= In-Reply-To: <viqqrf$169ep$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 4357 On 12/4/2024 7:06 PM, Rhino wrote: > On 2024-12-04 5:52 PM, moviePig wrote: >> On 12/4/2024 5:00 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>> On Dec 4, 2024 at 1:34:15 PM PST, "shawn" >>> <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On Wed, 4 Dec 2024 16:26:18 -0500, Rhino >>>> <no_offline_contact@example.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 2024-12-04 3:43 PM, moviePig wrote: >>>>>> On 12/4/2024 2:30 PM, BTR1701 wrote: >>>>>>> On Dec 4, 2024 at 1:30:43 AM PST, "Ubiquitous" >>>>>>> <weberm@polaris.net> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> A High School athlete gave a speech, which proves just how >>>>>>>> wrong John >>>>>>>> Oliver was. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://youtu.be/Gj8LTs-tUSI?si=DWJMYU65CAWjEHxH >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The "it's really not that common so we shouldn't worry about it" >>>>>>> excuse is particularly fucked up. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> How many young girls need to suffer injuries before we're >>>>>>> allowed to care >>>>>>> about it, John? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The United Nations put our a report a few weeks ago that said >>>>>>> in the >>>>>>> last two >>>>>>> years, over 600 medals in various competitions had been awarded >>>>>>> to troons >>>>>>> competing as women. That's 600 women who otherwise would have >>>>>>> won a >>>>>>> championship and who were denied the opportunity by a dude in a >>>>>>> skirt. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is 600 enough for us to care, John? Or does it need to be 1000? >>>>>>> Maybe >>>>>>> 10,000? >>>>>>> What's the number above which John Oliver and the rest of the >>>>>>> lunatic >>>>>>> wokies will allow us to care about this bullshit? >>>>>> How unfortunate that Oliver's show just began its seasonal >>>>>> hiatus... >>>>> The only thing unfortunate about it is that the hiatus is seasonal, >>>>> rather than permanent. >>>> >>>> I agree. The show should permanently on air, year round. Great idea. >>> >>> Not sure why Oliver's show being on hiatus is even relevant to what I >>> wrote in >>> the first place, but such are the mysteries of moviePig. >> >> Your video specifically attacks Oliver, and would, I'm guessing, be >> summarily dealt with if it came to his attention. > > I'm sure he deals with each and every criticism of his show > individually, regardless of the critic, including people who say things > on Usenet.... > >> In the meantime, Oliver claims that the frequency of such upstart >> transsexual incursions is "vanishingly small", which your video >> conspicuously doesn't refute. > > The number of genocides Adolf Hitler initiated is also vanishingly small > - two (counting the Jews and the gypsies) - so I guess that makes him > okay too then? > >> Personally, *I* remain open to any thoughtful analysis more >> comprehensive than a tearful teen learning some facts about "fairness". >> > And who would satisfy you as being a fair analyst if an actual living > breathing victim doesn't meet your criteria? Gosh, maybe someone who's in touch with the issue's several sides?