Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vir7gt$1cmk8$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran
Subject: Re: writing a module file in gfortran 14
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2024 21:43:24 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <vir7gt$1cmk8$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vio2n4$d19a$1@dont-email.me> <viqd1m$12u2e$1@dont-email.me>
 <viqh24$13p8p$2@dont-email.me> <viqsp8$16lin$1@dont-email.me>
 <vir0jo$17csf$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2024 04:43:26 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c9f188cbafad03b525ff23b54903d86c";
	logging-data="1464968"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19oiR5nUP0ULufp4Y4KnUf6dEqdL1Px+6U="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:qGgzxe6xWcBE1MSyAXMK3PdzkIo=
In-Reply-To: <vir0jo$17csf$2@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 1670

On 12/4/2024 7:45 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Dec 2024 18:40:08 -0600, Gary Scott wrote:
> 
>> I think the design is correct in requiring the implicit none to be
>> repeated.
> 
> The sooner that implicit “IMPLICIT NONE” is added to the standard, the
> better, I think.
> 
> In the meantime, gfortran (which is all anybody seems to be using anyway)
> has “-fimplicit-none” ...

Yes, "implicit none" should have been made the default in the Fortran 90 
version.  With all of the changes, it was time.

Lynn