Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vir7gt$1cmk8$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran Subject: Re: writing a module file in gfortran 14 Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2024 21:43:24 -0600 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 17 Message-ID: <vir7gt$1cmk8$1@dont-email.me> References: <vio2n4$d19a$1@dont-email.me> <viqd1m$12u2e$1@dont-email.me> <viqh24$13p8p$2@dont-email.me> <viqsp8$16lin$1@dont-email.me> <vir0jo$17csf$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2024 04:43:26 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="c9f188cbafad03b525ff23b54903d86c"; logging-data="1464968"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19oiR5nUP0ULufp4Y4KnUf6dEqdL1Px+6U=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:qGgzxe6xWcBE1MSyAXMK3PdzkIo= In-Reply-To: <vir0jo$17csf$2@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 1670 On 12/4/2024 7:45 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > On Wed, 4 Dec 2024 18:40:08 -0600, Gary Scott wrote: > >> I think the design is correct in requiring the implicit none to be >> repeated. > > The sooner that implicit “IMPLICIT NONE” is added to the standard, the > better, I think. > > In the meantime, gfortran (which is all anybody seems to be using anyway) > has “-fimplicit-none” ... Yes, "implicit none" should have been made the default in the Fortran 90 version. With all of the changes, it was time. Lynn