Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Damning With Faint Praise
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2024 07:40:32 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <virldg$1fkct$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vir4a8$18597$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2024 08:40:34 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="718d7cd066702bae5a8268aea9542583";
	logging-data="1560989"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18wjvkZYTT7eYa/m3he2apM"
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Xajg4FnRNA98JPycSYsHZAXMQjA=
Bytes: 2124

On 2024-12-05, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
> What is it with these Windows 10 users so hard up to “upgrade” to
> Windows 11? Do they really believe they are missing out on something?
> Do they think their ongoing dissatisfaction with their OS can be
> remedied, if only they go up just one more version?
>
> It was amusing to read this report
><https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/12/microsoft-reiterates-non-negotiable-tpm-2-0-requirement-for-windows-11/>
> about the ongoing attempts to come up with hacks to get around
> Microsoft’s restrictions on “unsupported” machines upgrading. The best
> thing the writer could find to say about Windows 11 was
>
>     ... but aside from that, Windows 11 usually runs about as well on
>     these PCs as Windows 10 did.

In context he's writing about PCs that don't meet the update requirements 
but have Windows 11 installed anyhow. He writes that, "of course support for 
these machines could be pulled at any time." So I'm not sure what point this 
writer was trying to make here.

-- 
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy 
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.”  —J.R.R. Tolkien