Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
 (extra-ordinary)
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2024 20:25:34 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <visune$1pp27$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me> <vier32$1madr$1@dont-email.me>
 <vierv5$1l1ot$2@dont-email.me> <viiqfd$2qq41$5@dont-email.me>
 <vijhrd$34mp8$1@dont-email.me> <vilh59$3k21l$5@dont-email.me>
 <vilheq$3ks01$3@dont-email.me> <vilhjk$3k21l$9@dont-email.me>
 <vilhk8$3ks01$4@dont-email.me> <vilhnl$3k21l$10@dont-email.me>
 <viljdo$3k21l$12@dont-email.me> <87frn50zjp.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
 <vinuvc$cdlu$1@dont-email.me> <vinvvu$c7p5$6@dont-email.me>
 <vio0u4$c7p5$8@dont-email.me> <vio8rj$ei97$5@dont-email.me>
 <vio9nu$f13q$1@dont-email.me> <vip1f1$npsr$2@dont-email.me>
 <vipaue$qd3r$1@dont-email.me> <87y10vzo35.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
 <vipf6v$qr8p$2@dont-email.me> <87ser3zgez.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
 <viqca6$12cut$2@dont-email.me> <virpnj$1g4uq$1@dont-email.me>
 <ff5ee533dd180eb24978c76e7e00ba6f4676d51a@i2pn2.org>
 <vis3iq$1iu5p$1@dont-email.me> <visafv$1kq6a$1@dont-email.me>
 <visi6v$1mmrh$1@dont-email.me> <vislkd$1nn4k$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2024 20:25:34 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e460a63d8fc463190e759e7a758b0cfb";
	logging-data="1893447"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+J4GLKwQpvAxDLugQ/wOkTr+YGRUYCH7M="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ReAElpLqroUSUsceNeGaUu/+Zpw=
In-Reply-To: <vislkd$1nn4k$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2642

On 05.12.2024 17:50, FromTheRafters wrote:
> WM pretended :
>> On 05.12.2024 14:40, FromTheRafters wrote:
>>> WM used his keyboard to write :
>>
>>>> All means all with no exception. But every number you can take 
>>>> belongs to a vanishing subset of ℕ.
>>>
>>> What do you mean by vanishing?
>>
>> The subset of numbers that can be taken is ℕ_def. It is smaller than
>> |ℕ|/k for every k ∈ ℕ.
>>
>> Have you meanwhile found an example for sequences with terms a_n = b_n 
>> for every n but different limit?
> 
> Why should I?

Your answer to Identical sequences have the same limit: "Running with 
buffaloes does not make one a buffalo" appeared to doubt my claim.

Regards, WM