Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written
Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_=E2=80=9CClimate_Change_over_the_past_4000_Years?=
 =?UTF-8?B?4oCd?=
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2024 13:33:57 -0800
Organization: nil
Lines: 63
Message-ID: <vit685$1rk6g$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vio9m2$f2q4$1@dont-email.me> <viod19$fjba$1@dont-email.me>
 <viom8p$le67$1@dont-email.me> <HG%3P.63774$vLg2.40605@fx17.iad>
 <8d2aa1bc-5adc-a9c4-eda4-d16edafdc73d@example.net>
 <visuqh$1pt4g$1@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: blissInSanFrancisco@mouse-potato.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2024 22:33:58 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b766695ba18ac2ca7e6ffbf2192d1620";
	logging-data="1954000"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19//BCc3wXA9dU11Clhy5bA"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:4ZXL4qdPZ6g9XyJ/4Q6HGUed8zM=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <visuqh$1pt4g$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 3620

On 12/5/24 11:26, William Hyde wrote:
> D wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 4 Dec 2024, Scott Lurndal wrote:
>>
>>> Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> writes:
>>>> On 12/3/2024 7:59 PM, Bobbie Sellers wrote:
>>>>> On 12/3/24 17:01, Lynn McGuire wrote:
>>>>>> ???Climate Change over the past 4000 Years???
>>>
>>>> I have quite a bit of experience running forced flow and natural flow
>>>> reactors.  Sol acts exactly like a natural flow reactor with both short
>>>> and long cycles of variability.
>>>
>>> You have zero climate science background, so your experience with
>>> non-nuclear reactors seems somewhat irrelevent.
>>
>> Nonsense. Climate "science" is political. The real stuff is climate 
>> science reduced to physics.
> 
> Let's try a little test, shall we?
> 
> What do you think is used to create climate models?
> 
> No cheating, no looking it up.  I want to know what you thought at the 
> time you wrote the above.
> 
> William Hyde


The United Nations Environment Program reports more than 20 of the
world’s 72 seagrass species are on the decline. As a result, an
estimated 7 percent of these habitats are lost each year.

In the western Atlantic, some eelgrass meadows have been reduced
by more than 90 percent in the last 100 years, according to The
Nature Conservancy, an environmental nonprofit that works to protect 
lands and waters around the world.

	Now, rising sea surface temperatures caused by global
warming are pushing the plant to the brink of extinction.

<https://arstechnica.com/science/2024/12/seagrass-is-fantastic-at-carbon-capture-and-its-at-risk-of-extinction/>

      I saw something on TV about attempts by the flightless
two-legged shore birds called humans, were making to spread
  eel grass. I missed the part about eel grass being
close to extinction.
   Without the meadows of eel grass will the eel thrive?
   Will there be no more Japaneses style bar-be-qued Eel?
	
But aside from that, that is a common story in these days of
something that has been doing us good, quietly working in the
background to make our existence more tenable and we are
destroying its habitat.

     I may put it under some climate skeptics (yes there are
those still who blinded by a fossil fuel income) cannot see
past the end of their noses.

         bliss - stewing in my own juice