Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vit6v7$1qfgg$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Bart <bc@freeuk.com> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: question about linker Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2024 21:46:15 +0000 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 25 Message-ID: <vit6v7$1qfgg$2@dont-email.me> References: <vi54e9$3ie0o$1@dont-email.me> <vil0qc$3fqqa$3@dont-email.me> <vil82t$3ie9o$2@dont-email.me> <vila9j$3j4dg$1@dont-email.me> <vin4su$49a6$1@dont-email.me> <vin95m$5da6$1@dont-email.me> <vinh3h$7ppb$1@dont-email.me> <vinjf8$8jur$1@dont-email.me> <vip5rf$p44n$1@dont-email.me> <viprao$umjj$1@dont-email.me> <viqfk9$13esp$1@dont-email.me> <vir5kp$3hjd9$1@paganini.bofh.team> <vishtd$1mnq1$1@dont-email.me> <visola$1ohbl$1@dont-email.me> <0jm4P.1016$rDDb.645@fx36.iad> <visur8$1pj41$1@dont-email.me> <jXn4P.324$2ora.43@fx33.iad> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2024 22:46:15 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="12866f4cee3d02926546f0c9d8eee755"; logging-data="1916432"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+YpWsNyfqfyO+D9LVjw1Rl" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:ygZHcs1U3Xr4n1aHJw1CU27DGWU= In-Reply-To: <jXn4P.324$2ora.43@fx33.iad> Content-Language: en-GB Bytes: 2415 On 05/12/2024 20:21, Scott Lurndal wrote: > Bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes: >> >> Since converting C code to native code is something that can be done at >> 10MB/sec per core. Is your final binary 36GB? > > Of course not, I posted the size, it's 7MB. You posted a 7MB size (and an 8MB one), in a post about hypothetical 1-10GB executables. I didn't realise it was the size of the project that took 1 hour of CPU time to build. So that's about 2KB/second of CPU time. This is about half the speed of my first assembler, that ran on a 2.5MHz 8-bit processor in 16KB, which could translate assembly to binary at about 4KB/second. I can't say I'm impressed. Oh, I forgot: you're using 6 cores, to effectively achieve 9KB/second. I reckon you could write the output to floppy disk, without impacting those 13 minutes too much! Somebody would have to keep switching disks though.