| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vitflv$1tu05$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: William Hyde <wthyde1953@gmail.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.sf.written Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?Re:_=e2=80=9cClimate_Change_over_the_past_4000_Years?= =?UTF-8?B?4oCd?= Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2024 19:14:55 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 45 Message-ID: <vitflv$1tu05$1@dont-email.me> References: <vio9m2$f2q4$1@dont-email.me> <viod19$fjba$1@dont-email.me> <viom8p$le67$1@dont-email.me> <HG%3P.63774$vLg2.40605@fx17.iad> <8d2aa1bc-5adc-a9c4-eda4-d16edafdc73d@example.net> <visuqh$1pt4g$1@dont-email.me> <e8ecaa0b-9747-147b-54aa-35d2f178c6f5@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2024 01:14:56 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="badffb895a85375045c3c17c5454a7bd"; logging-data="2029573"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/d7RJdxQBIbo6shZCGdGMN" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.19 Cancel-Lock: sha1:SgzmCZ04PNdltZuFiWapvexIjSc= X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 241205-4, 12/5/2024), Outbound message In-Reply-To: <e8ecaa0b-9747-147b-54aa-35d2f178c6f5@example.net> X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Bytes: 2762 D wrote: > > > On Thu, 5 Dec 2024, William Hyde wrote: > >> D wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Wed, 4 Dec 2024, Scott Lurndal wrote: >>> >>>> Lynn McGuire <lynnmcguire5@gmail.com> writes: >>>>> On 12/3/2024 7:59 PM, Bobbie Sellers wrote: >>>>>> On 12/3/24 17:01, Lynn McGuire wrote: >>>>>>> ???Climate Change over the past 4000 Years??? >>>> >>>>> I have quite a bit of experience running forced flow and natural flow >>>>> reactors. Sol acts exactly like a natural flow reactor with both >>>>> short >>>>> and long cycles of variability. >>>> >>>> You have zero climate science background, so your experience with >>>> non-nuclear reactors seems somewhat irrelevent. >>> >>> Nonsense. Climate "science" is political. The real stuff is climate >>> science reduced to physics. >> >> Let's try a little test, shall we? >> >> What do you think is used to create climate models? >> >> No cheating, no looking it up. I want to know what you thought at the >> time you wrote the above. >> >> William Hyde > > That models can be whipped up at will, based on the directions of the > people who are funding it. Climate gate is an excellent example of the > corruption in the field. It was probably just the tip of the iceberg. That is not an answer to the question I asked. Try again. William Hyde