Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.raspberry-pi
Subject: Re: Pi-FAN for RPi4 with 4 (instead of 3) cables?
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2024 16:43:17 +0000
Organization: A little, after lunch
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <vj1tv5$36k5b$3@dont-email.me>
References: <lr6kk0FnendU1@mid.individual.net>
 <nco*Rz70z@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk> <lrbiqpFh6q1U1@mid.individual.net>
 <virltb$1fqan$1@dont-email.me> <lrgherFb1j1U1@mid.individual.net>
 <vj1d28$31v9g$12@dont-email.me> <lrja4sFokhnU2@mid.individual.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2024 17:43:17 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="d0a9fc17b6f8caea45cd793b92a18377";
	logging-data="3362987"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/yeesisZMcp/Fq2PPdNOPX2dZA2oIvEgs="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ckPZflsqiBzsepHGGpPZGL+xY6g=
In-Reply-To: <lrja4sFokhnU2@mid.individual.net>
Content-Language: en-GB
Bytes: 2070

On 07/12/2024 16:06, s|b wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Dec 2024 11:54:48 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> 
>> It's an interesting thought as to why one would use a fan at all. If its
>> such a high compute task that you need one, maybe a bigger Pi or an
>> Intel based machine is indicated.
> 
> I know I don't really need it, but some people claim it's better to have
> the CPU at (for instance) 35°C than 48°C. It can't hurt, can it?
>   

I think it will probably extend the chip lifetime from about 150 years 
to a couple of thousand.

>> I dislike fans. They fail.
> 
> Well, if this one fails I won't be in trouble, because it does fine
> without it. ;-)
> 
Well that's true!
-- 
"The great thing about Glasgow is that if there's a nuclear attack it'll 
look exactly the same afterwards."

Billy Connolly