Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic,comp.ai.philosophy
Subject: Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting
 problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2024 12:44:29 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 77
Message-ID: <vj252d$38tkl$1@dont-email.me>
References: <f4f759fcc2f0b701a91e38062c25d16534e470af@i2pn2.org>
 <vilrih$3n2q7$2@dont-email.me>
 <b961b7e79a85fcb3bbd058930fef41e582f7acdd@i2pn2.org>
 <vio31i$dg23$1@dont-email.me>
 <4ccc2cbecfd0e6befd031ed394f1262edd021822@i2pn2.org>
 <viposd$u16a$1@dont-email.me>
 <dd3385b7f379281e5d476701f96e30538ea85802@i2pn2.org>
 <viqua6$16uvh$1@dont-email.me>
 <3d80e95768bf6260168865530aaad3591aa03fda@i2pn2.org>
 <vir0c7$17d36$1@dont-email.me>
 <6d0683c816f5f63b3a17c8a52e9b691eecc143a8@i2pn2.org>
 <vir0sq$17ga3$1@dont-email.me>
 <2ebbdef8e9070397a2ec3db6dbc37c16f1fe8923@i2pn2.org>
 <vir9n1$1cqu9$1@dont-email.me>
 <visnat$1o5le$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <vj0amr$2mpd0$1@dont-email.me>
 <5e1d34cbe07b0dbffe60a12121f2f751b308c1c5@i2pn2.org>
 <vj0d0q$2n835$2@dont-email.me> <vj0glp$2ruve$1@dont-email.me>
 <vj1bno$31ulr$1@dont-email.me>
 <a878bf6ecb0762730ecc95c40e09d6ba93cb5293@i2pn2.org>
 <vj1qeu$35kfh$1@dont-email.me>
 <3431ec3bd2abdc62d693959664e202aa3bc214bd@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2024 19:44:29 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e9bb7a7e09a052885dc07388bbe7af3b";
	logging-data="3438229"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Tmz3hUCCr8biQVpRJUZ11"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:xFLRnVNjFfT6DbOFRO3r+H2kCpY=
In-Reply-To: <3431ec3bd2abdc62d693959664e202aa3bc214bd@i2pn2.org>
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Content-Language: en-US
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 241207-4, 12/7/2024), Outbound message
Bytes: 4889

On 12/7/2024 12:07 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 12/7/24 10:43 AM, olcott wrote:
>> On 12/7/2024 6:18 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 12/7/24 6:32 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 12/6/2024 9:50 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>> olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 12/6/2024 8:40 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>> On 12/6/24 9:08 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 12/5/2024 11:20 AM, Bonita Montero wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Am 05.12.2024 um 05:20 schrieb olcott:
>>>>>>>>>> There is an 80% chance that I will be alive in one month.
>>>>>>>>>> There may be an extended pause in my comments.
>>>>>>>>>> I will try to bring a computer to the out of town hospital.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Maybe you'll solve your halting problem issues before you die.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> typedef void (*ptr)();
>>>>>>>> int HHH(ptr P);
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> int DD()
>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>     int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
>>>>>>>>     if (Halt_Status)
>>>>>>>>       HERE: goto HERE;
>>>>>>>>     return Halt_Status;
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> int main()
>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>     HHH(DD);
>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am sure that DD correctly emulated by HHH according to
>>>>>>>> the semantics of the C programming language cannot possibly
>>>>>>>> reach its own return instruction final halt state.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How does HHH correctly emulated DD, if it isn't give tne code for 
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> HHH that DD calls?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As I have told you many dozens of times HHH and DD share
>>>>>> the same global memory space within memory version of the
>>>>>> Halt7.obj file.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> And thus you admit that your HHH isn’t the required “pure function” 
>>>>> as its
>>>>> result is dependent on that contents of that global memory, and not 
>>>>> just
>>>>> its input, as required by the definition of a global function,
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> First we have to acknowledge that pure function or not HHH does 
>>>> something unprecedented in the history of the halting problem:
>>>> HHH does correctly reject its input as non-halting.
>>>
>>> No, it doesn't do anything "unprecedented".
>>>
>>
>> Changing the subject to a different criteria
>> IS CHEATING USING THE STRAWMAN DECEPTION
>>
> 
> Right, which is what *YOU* have done. As your subject says, you are 
> talking about the *HALTING PROPBLEM* which has a defined criteeria
> 

When I say the the work that I accomplished ON MY CRITERIA
has never been done before IT IS WOEFULLY DISHONEST to
rebut this by changing the subject to some other criteria.

-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer