Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com>
Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android,comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Joel won't, so I will (was Re: Bungling Apple Lost the Plot on
 Texting
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2024 14:06:23 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 32
Message-ID: <vj2gt0$3bogl$1@dont-email.me>
References: <visjbn$1mraa$2@dont-email.me>
 <17d4ljd6ajlkjlbf2r86cflqfbjljjoup1@4ax.com> <vitotm$23fab$1@dont-email.me>
 <0hr4ljhkatgq9pnje0venf0ckf2k5mpv94@4ax.com> <vituve$24o7j$1@dont-email.me>
 <viur39$2b258$1@dont-email.me> <7a26ljtptkdkdkk7g7l0gdcahbinhilbk3@4ax.com>
 <vivqt4$2g19u$2@dont-email.me> <qqu6lj97e9ao80750gi6ajrjv1dcct7p9r@4ax.com>
 <vj090q$2mg5l$1@dont-email.me> <04e7ljptbegu1cqvv7jrfvtv6j7d93dt1h@4ax.com>
 <vj0r35$2u4g0$1@dont-email.me> <iah9ljd7qhipcjv6909aiufcaf1hi2uvuu@4ax.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2024 23:06:24 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7c9968941c44b87f453a7a06366bf738";
	logging-data="3531285"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+S/mXGQXETlCd26aExeNLt5xY6Jti6uzg="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:z4iZqf8UJBT72yGHRInEcsfB0iY=
Content-Language: en-CA
In-Reply-To: <iah9ljd7qhipcjv6909aiufcaf1hi2uvuu@4ax.com>
Bytes: 2892

On 2024-12-07 14:00, Joel wrote:
> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>> On 2024-12-06 19:00, Joel wrote:
>>> Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
>>>> On 2024-12-06 16:28, Joel wrote:
>>>>> -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...and still waiting on you to post benchmarks, too... /s
>>>>>
>>>>> I haven't addressed the external storage's speed, but immediate access
>>>>> of internal drives is a higher grade or level.
>>>>
>>>> That is a question of speed and you're just making yourself look stupid
>>>> by trying to create clever sounding phrases.
>>>
>>> And you appear to be a genius, to have out-reasoned me at every turn,
>>> along with -hh, it's amusing.
>>
>> You haven't even understood the basic facts of what Thunderbolt is, doofus.
>>
>> How is that my problem?
> 
> 
> I understand the claim that Thunderbolt's speed is comparable to
> internal's.  I accept it, even.  It doesn't magically make an external
> drive internal.
But your objection was that somehow the "access" of an external drive 
wasn't as "immediate", but now you accept that Thunderbolt is as fast as 
an internal four lane PCIe 3.0 bus (amazing that someone who claims to 
be as 1337 as yourself didn't already know about that, huh?).

So how is it less immediate?