Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: olcott <polcott333@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory,sci.logic,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: This first time anyone In the entire history of the halting
 problem derived a correct return value for HHH(DD)
Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2024 16:46:26 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 116
Message-ID: <vj2j83$3bqcr$2@dont-email.me>
References: <f4f759fcc2f0b701a91e38062c25d16534e470af@i2pn2.org>
 <vio31i$dg23$1@dont-email.me>
 <4ccc2cbecfd0e6befd031ed394f1262edd021822@i2pn2.org>
 <viposd$u16a$1@dont-email.me>
 <dd3385b7f379281e5d476701f96e30538ea85802@i2pn2.org>
 <viqua6$16uvh$1@dont-email.me>
 <3d80e95768bf6260168865530aaad3591aa03fda@i2pn2.org>
 <vir0c7$17d36$1@dont-email.me>
 <6d0683c816f5f63b3a17c8a52e9b691eecc143a8@i2pn2.org>
 <vir0sq$17ga3$1@dont-email.me>
 <2ebbdef8e9070397a2ec3db6dbc37c16f1fe8923@i2pn2.org>
 <vir9n1$1cqu9$1@dont-email.me>
 <visnat$1o5le$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
 <vj0amr$2mpd0$1@dont-email.me>
 <5e1d34cbe07b0dbffe60a12121f2f751b308c1c5@i2pn2.org>
 <vj0d0q$2n835$2@dont-email.me> <vj0glp$2ruve$1@dont-email.me>
 <vj1bno$31ulr$1@dont-email.me>
 <a878bf6ecb0762730ecc95c40e09d6ba93cb5293@i2pn2.org>
 <vj1qeu$35kfh$1@dont-email.me>
 <3431ec3bd2abdc62d693959664e202aa3bc214bd@i2pn2.org>
 <vj252d$38tkl$1@dont-email.me>
 <9d0a00ef6ef09f7b79e6f91983050dc17afcc151@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2024 23:46:27 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e9bb7a7e09a052885dc07388bbe7af3b";
	logging-data="3533211"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/OZVpf8bb+1Ne2MrRaQqLM"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:4qCYzbc8nYQC4QooOF+6o17Lahk=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <9d0a00ef6ef09f7b79e6f91983050dc17afcc151@i2pn2.org>
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
X-Antivirus: Norton (VPS 241207-4, 12/7/2024), Outbound message
Bytes: 5911

On 12/7/2024 4:20 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 12/7/24 1:44 PM, olcott wrote:
>> On 12/7/2024 12:07 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>> On 12/7/24 10:43 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>> On 12/7/2024 6:18 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>> On 12/7/24 6:32 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>> On 12/6/2024 9:50 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>> olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 12/6/2024 8:40 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 12/6/24 9:08 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 12/5/2024 11:20 AM, Bonita Montero wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Am 05.12.2024 um 05:20 schrieb olcott:
>>>>>>>>>>>> There is an 80% chance that I will be alive in one month.
>>>>>>>>>>>> There may be an extended pause in my comments.
>>>>>>>>>>>> I will try to bring a computer to the out of town hospital.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe you'll solve your halting problem issues before you die.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> typedef void (*ptr)();
>>>>>>>>>> int HHH(ptr P);
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> int DD()
>>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>>>     int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
>>>>>>>>>>     if (Halt_Status)
>>>>>>>>>>       HERE: goto HERE;
>>>>>>>>>>     return Halt_Status;
>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> int main()
>>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>>>     HHH(DD);
>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I am sure that DD correctly emulated by HHH according to
>>>>>>>>>> the semantics of the C programming language cannot possibly
>>>>>>>>>> reach its own return instruction final halt state.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How does HHH correctly emulated DD, if it isn't give tne code 
>>>>>>>>> for the
>>>>>>>>> HHH that DD calls?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> As I have told you many dozens of times HHH and DD share
>>>>>>>> the same global memory space within memory version of the
>>>>>>>> Halt7.obj file.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And thus you admit that your HHH isn’t the required “pure 
>>>>>>> function” as its
>>>>>>> result is dependent on that contents of that global memory, and 
>>>>>>> not just
>>>>>>> its input, as required by the definition of a global function,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> First we have to acknowledge that pure function or not HHH does 
>>>>>> something unprecedented in the history of the halting problem:
>>>>>> HHH does correctly reject its input as non-halting.
>>>>>
>>>>> No, it doesn't do anything "unprecedented".
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Changing the subject to a different criteria
>>>> IS CHEATING USING THE STRAWMAN DECEPTION
>>>>
>>>
>>> Right, which is what *YOU* have done. As your subject says, you are 
>>> talking about the *HALTING PROPBLEM* which has a defined criteeria
>>>
>>
>> When I say the the work that I accomplished ON MY CRITERIA
>> has never been done before IT IS WOEFULLY DISHONEST to
>> rebut this by changing the subject to some other criteria.
>>
> 
> 
> Then the work you have accopmllished is just a LIE.
> 
> Just like the climare and election deniers.
> 

I wrote a paper on climate change
Severe anthropogenic climate change proven entirely with verifiable facts
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336568434_Severe_anthropogenic_climate_change_proven_entirely_with_verifiable_facts 


typedef void (*ptr)();
int HHH(ptr P);

int DD()
{
   int Halt_Status = HHH(DD);
   if (Halt_Status)
     HERE: goto HERE;
   return Halt_Status;
}

int main()
{
   HHH(DD);
}


When I say that simulating termination analyzer HHH does
correctly reject DD on the basis that DD emulated by HHH**
does not halt THIS IS A MATTER OF FACT.

**according to the semantics of C or x86 machine language.



-- 
Copyright 2024 Olcott "Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius
hits a target no one else can see." Arthur Schopenhauer