Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vj8hjq$qo14$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Rich <rich@example.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 04:55:22 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 53 Message-ID: <vj8hjq$qo14$2@dont-email.me> References: <o4ucnYo2YLqmZ876nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@earthlink.com> <vj1m3f$33eu5$16@dont-email.me> <aS2dnU8NvNJ3qsj6nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <lrl33gF2rglU1@mid.individual.net> <9eb45192-e996-fa3d-b002-c02798bb2b7a@example.net> <vj4hf9$3sqat$4@dont-email.me> <5e0c7681-481e-b1b2-eec2-321c161c9fd5@example.net> <vj5ae5$2jpn$1@dont-email.me> <8Gq5P.102877$7FA3.45532@fx13.iad> <d0d3824c-88d6-76cf-a58b-e1fd2b5d2fc7@example.net> Injection-Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 05:55:22 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="64431ee995281286d1b0df5bbc8ab0f7"; logging-data="876580"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+5wBEZTi+AslqrDaPzN/0w" User-Agent: tin/2.6.1-20211226 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.139 (x86_64)) Cancel-Lock: sha1:EyynjlHDi42dntuakill/dREkXA= Bytes: 3557 D <nospam@example.net> wrote: > > > On Mon, 9 Dec 2024, Charlie Gibbs wrote: > >> On 2024-12-08, Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote: >> >>> And consider the explosive force stored in a 350-700 bar (your >>> AI's number) pressure vessel that becomes brittle enough to go "bang". >>> That's one hell of a bang, even without the hydrogen itself explosively >>> combusting as part of the pressure release. >> >> I've seen the results of a 200-bar scuba tank letting go. >> And that's just a little 80-cubic foot tank filled with air. > > How did this happen? In sweden, there is an epidemic of bombings for the > past couple of years, since crazy drug dealing arabians are waging some > kind of war with hand grenades, and car battery bombs in the bigger > cities. > > Would using scuba tanks be a cheaper way for them to bomb each other? Likely not as cheap as a car battery. I see a 2.3L mini scuba tank on Amazon for $299 (no idea how big a 2.3L mini tank really is). I can get a car battery for about $100 at the local auto-store. And the scuba tank will not also spray sulfuric acid over everyone when it goes "bang". And short of an armor peircing slug, it is probably more difficult to get a new scuba tank to go "bang" vs becoming a brief high speed rocket or spinner. > Also, how does a car battery bomb work? Perhaps google would answer your question... Or perhaps google would report you to the authorities for even asking the question? > I'ev seen videos of exploding lithium batteries, but that does not > look as efficient to me as just producing good, old, gun powder at > home and making your own. > > So with that in mind, what would be the advantage of a car battery bomb > over regular gun powder plus a pipe? Lack of education maybe? They can buy the car battery at an auto parts store (no education required, just the local currency) and they likely have a "script" passed down that they have no idea how/why it works, but if the do x, y, and z, it does work. Making gunpower does require some knowledge and skill -- although presumably it too could be scripted. So perhaps the 'authorities' are watching the gunpowder precursor purchases, but not watching 'car battery' purchases?