Article <vja4oh$13lbb$1@dont-email.me>

Deutsch English Français Italiano
<vja4oh$13lbb$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article
Path: ...!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!feeds.news.ox.ac.uk!news.ox.ac.uk!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail
From: RonO <rokimoto557@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: talk.origins
Subject: Re: Another California child infected by H5N1
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 13:28:18 -0600
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 45
Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org
Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org
Message-ID: <vja4oh$13lbb$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vj7l19$im7c$1@dont-email.me>
Reply-To: rokimoto557@gmail.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89";
	logging-data="24461"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Sy0PIM5V2d6mEs/iWVCYTakK16Y=
In-Reply-To: <vj7l19$im7c$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 5189

On 12/9/2024 2:47 PM, RonO wrote:
> https://medicalxpress.com/news/2024-12-h5n1-bird-flu-case-california.html
> 
> They haven't confirmed that it is the Dairy virus, but it seems to be 
> H5N1.  Marin County is North of San Francisco.  The first child was in 
> Alameda that is South of San Francisco.  The child has no known exposure 
> to animals.  If it is the dairy virus they have to start testing the 
> milk supply.  That is the direct contact that these kids have with dairy 
> cows, but they did not test the milk supply after the first child 
> because it is bad for the dairy industry.  Pasteurized milk is supposed 
> to be safe, but the CDC's own research indicated that the virus could 
> survive the most common pasteurization method and could survive in whole 
> milk for 4 days.  The FDA claimed that it was doing further tests on the 
> milk supply after that study, but nothing has been published about their 
> results (Project started in early Nov.) and they were doing the study 
> incorrectly.  They were asking for volunteers and claimed that they 
> would keep the dairies anonymous.  The processing plants that did not 
> volunteer are the ones that you want to test as the most likely to have 
> issues with their pasteurization.  The method may be 100% effective when 
> within specifications, but how often are those specifications not met? 
> That is the main question that the FDA has to answer.
> 
> Ron Okimoto
> 

https://www.cdc.gov/bird-flu/spotlights/h5n1-response-12092024.html

The CDC has just released that the virus that infected the first 
California child was genotype B3.13 and is the virus that has infected 
dairy cattle and dairy workers in California.

In their follow-up actions they continue to make the claim that there is 
no evidence for human to human infection, and refuse to acknowledge that 
the only contact to the dairy virus that this kid had was the dairy 
products that they ingested.  How can they keep ignoring the most likely 
avenue of infection?  They refuse to acknowledge their own research 
indicating that the virus can survive the most common form of 
pasteurization, and do not recommend testing of the California milk 
supply.  They are in denial even though a second California child has 
likely been infected by the dairy virus.  They should stop calling it 
avian influenza when it is being spread by dairy cattle and dairy 
workers.  These kids are likely getting infected by the dairy cattle 
somehow, and dairy products are what they have been consuming.

Ron Okimoto