Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Jonathan B. Horen" <jbhoren@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.raspberry-pi
Subject: Re: Homebrew pi400
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 19:20:46 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 10
Message-ID: <vjalsu$t70o$1@dont-email.me>
References: <87v7wgw3sh.fsf@rpi3> <87v7vr40jj.fsf@rpi3>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 01:20:47 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b8bf2f47b383c2dd721e9582b84d47af";
	logging-data="957464"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19giYUVipmZlq4eEg44l+S0"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Ki0wVOfpym6aWvUB8H9Hw1umOrU=
In-Reply-To: <87v7vr40jj.fsf@rpi3>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 1490

On 12/10/24 17:48, Daniel wrote:
> Wellp, glad I didn't very far on my homebrew pi400 project. Now that
> they quietly released the Pi500, I'll be focusing on that now.
> 
> I still have to watch the youtube reviews of it.

I read Jeff Geerling's recent write-up on it 
(https://www.jeffgeerling.com/blog/2024/pi-500-much-faster-lacks-m2) as 
a "mixed review", and would be wary of investing even the $120 for one 
(the kit, or $90 for the standalone). YMMV