Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: sci.logic
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational
 numbers (extra-ordinary)
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 00:25:49 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <vjam6d$1700v$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vhkhun$28qt$1@dont-email.me>
 <vhmtph$j1ek$1@dont-email.me>
 <vhn1jk$jf6v$1@dont-email.me>
 <vhn3po$jvo1$1@dont-email.me>
 <vhn420$jf6v$3@dont-email.me>
 <vhpg51$13soc$1@dont-email.me>
 <vhpnrb$15239$1@dont-email.me>
 <vhs2gn$1kjtc$1@dont-email.me>
 <vhs4ue$1ku9t$1@dont-email.me>
 <vhv6or$280s6$1@dont-email.me>
 <vhvbjb$28n6o$1@dont-email.me>
 <vi1dbj$2moon$1@dont-email.me>
 <vi224l$2pgrd$1@dont-email.me>
 <vi4383$3csd4$2@dont-email.me>
 <vi4a6c$3dt4s$2@dont-email.me>
 <vi6p1l$3uoti$1@dont-email.me>
 <vi6unr$3v0dn$5@dont-email.me>
 <vihd3l$2d9fk$1@dont-email.me>
 <vihfai$2cnof$1@dont-email.me>
 <vijrru$37ce1$1@dont-email.me>
 <vikh9k$3cua3$1@dont-email.me>
 <viml28$6j3$1@dont-email.me>
 <0b1bb1a1-40e3-464f-9e3d-a5ac22dfdc6f@tha.de>
 <95183b4d9c2e32651963bac79965313ad2bfe7e8@i2pn2.org>
 <vj6vhh$elqh$2@dont-email.me>
 <33512b63716ac263c16b7d64cd1d77578c8aea9d@i2pn2.org>
 <vj9s4i$11a3p$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2024 01:25:49 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="7d00a12bb40ff3cda3e3b7540eeb9452";
	logging-data="1277983"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX196LZru8IhjgFIT2Zv5pEfKPCaxtWHeK9w="
User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPad)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:9RJNrFbpWa8Gzid4LVlQqKGCCkk=
	sha1:fd/RK/cNV4RzKn0gM+SdYesbU7M=
Bytes: 2692

WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de> wrote:
> On 10.12.2024 13:19, Richard Damon wrote:
> 
>> 
>> The pairing is between TWO sets, not the members of a set with itself.
> 
> The pairing is between the elements. Otherwise you could pair R and Q by 
> simply claiming it.
> "The infinite sequence thus defined has the peculiar property to contain 
> the positive rational numbers completely, and each of them only once at 
> a determined place." [Cantor] Note the numbers, not the set.
> 
> Regards, WM
> 
> 

The pairing of the elements of *TWO* sets, like R and Q or N and the set of
elements of N that are 0 mod 10.

TWO different sets, not the elements of a set and some of the elements of
that same set.

Sorry, you are just proving that you logic is based on LIES.