| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vjii9m$3ltn2$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: Win11 explorer bug? Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 17:08:13 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 50 Message-ID: <vjii9m$3ltn2$2@dont-email.me> References: <vjg7dh$kf$2@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <vjgm11$396oa$1@dont-email.me> <vjhupn$1ds9$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <vji6qd$3jsoc$1@dont-email.me> <vjib0c$2u4n$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2024 01:08:23 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="50ad193a0c17c9bb9ff03ce57c418426"; logging-data="3864290"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/H5y3IAdOQGIxWr+CGyGsz" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:Jspj93vOxUjqAxvSgBjfYlEWTb8= In-Reply-To: <vjib0c$2u4n$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> Content-Language: en-US Bytes: 3288 On 12/13/2024 3:03 PM, Edward Rawde wrote: > "Don Y" <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote in message news:vji6qd$3jsoc$1@dont-email.me... >> On 12/13/2024 11:35 AM, Edward Rawde wrote: >>> "Don Y" <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote in message news:vjgm11$396oa$1@dont-email.me... >>>> On 12/12/2024 7:50 PM, Edward Rawde wrote: >>>>> I'm getting 441 header line too long while trying to reply to Don Y in the other thread so I'm going to leave it there. >>>>> >>>>> Some organizations are obviously doing a lot better then others at cybersecurity. >>>> >>>> <https://www.crn.com/news/security/2024/10-major-cyberattacks-and-data-breaches-in-2024-so-far> >>>> >>>> at least, the ones that we KNOW about... >>>> >>>> >>> >>> They are all large organizations rather than a single location with a single firewall. >>> >>> Large organisations don't have a single individual doing firewall configuration and security for the entire organisation. >> >> No. They have automated tools doing this work. No one spends their time >> manually browsing log files. > > You must have worked for may different large organizations to know how they all do things. Yes. And have colleagues at (or who have consulted with) others. > Did you miss the part where I said I have automated tools (python scripts) to deal with log files? > > I maintain a blacklist of 200,000 IPv4 addresses and networks in otherwise friendly countries. > Doing that manually would be ridiculous. And I rely on a knock sequence. Who's spending LESS time on maintaining their service? >> >>> The ones who have breaches more likely have managers who don't want anything touched if it's working. >>> >>> So the individual who suggests that changes should be made to restrict database connections to nothing other than known IP >>> addresses >>> or networks, rather than having them open to the entire world, is likely to be ignored. This is, of course, just one of the >>> myriad >>> reasons why breaches occur. >>> >>> >> >> > >