Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vjk0ie$nd7$4@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2024 13:18:06 +0000
Organization: A little, after lunch
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <vjk0ie$nd7$4@dont-email.me>
References: <o4ucnYo2YLqmZ876nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <G5mdnXqNwMsTeMr6nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <lrqaq4FstdvU1@mid.individual.net>
 <2I6dnRAQE4x-u8T6nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <lrsoe6Fac80U1@mid.individual.net>
 <yRWdnUoeG4z9z8T6nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <lruuasFl4n6U1@mid.individual.net>
 <QSKdnZ8NtLd7ysf6nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <lrvm17FohqnU3@mid.individual.net>
 <142dnZ34m8FYN8f6nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <ls0vsbFembU5@mid.individual.net> <vji4gs$3jdbj$1@dont-email.me>
 <ls41jgFfeshU2@mid.individual.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2024 14:18:06 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="63747a19b95c63ec9864040b731c8f1c";
	logging-data="23975"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/P0aGo91Ch0ISPRQi3p1YYz2Issdp/C7o="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Z9MKUpWvDUfL6CQEmXBvlQJWEuQ=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <ls41jgFfeshU2@mid.individual.net>
Bytes: 2682

On 14/12/2024 00:25, rbowman wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 20:13:16 -0000 (UTC), Rich wrote:
> 
>> The AT&T PC clone (itself a rebranded Olivetti machine) was an 8086.
>> That was my first exposure to the IBM PC compatible world, an AT&T PC
>> clone running the 8086.  While one /could/ measure the performance
>> difference in benchmarks, in real world usage it was not markedly
>> 'faster' than an 8088 based system (i.e., the 20MB hard disk was the
>> same performance for both, and its sluggishness was what one spent most
>> of one's time waiting upon).
> 
> Then there was the best of both worlds NEC V20.
> 
> https://hackaday.com/2020/07/10/an-nec-v20-for-two-processors-in-one-sbc/
> 
> That one must have really chafed Intel's butt, a pin compatible drop in a
> little faster that the 8088 and, wait for it, we had a few transistors
> left over so it emulates the 8080 too. No wonder Intel sued.

My first PC had a V20. Clean clone. Did much work on that.


-- 
Socialism is the philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance and the 
gospel of envy.

Its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery.

Winston Churchill