Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have
 high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2024 15:44:49 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <vjk95h$28k0$1@dont-email.me>
References: <hikplj9384rou0rmr2f8c6pmr0e09pcsi5@4ax.com>
 <ls42suFfeshU4@mid.individual.net>
 <ndmpljh9c3nljm6qltc2kelgs06u4f94ng@4ax.com>
 <4gf7P.5896$Uup4.1220@fx10.iad>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2024 16:44:49 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="87696454279a1fb524d9523074241586";
	logging-data="74368"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/tJ9b9keZfrebh7QXxV7CK"
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:2X9y15FgmIBHBUGhMUQUN8otsGw=
Bytes: 1800

On 2024-12-14, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
>
> Higher performance per watt which leads to lower power use and therefore 
> improved battery life. Whether Intel and AMD want to admit it or not, 
> people _do_ want to have a computer which can handle a whole day's work 
> on a single charge and which won't increase electrical bills.

While I agree that most people want longer battery life for their laptops, I 
really don't think the cost of charging a laptop is that big of a concern.

-- 
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy 
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.”  —J.R.R. Tolkien