Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have
 high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2024 15:58:03 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <vjk9ub$28k0$2@dont-email.me>
References: <hikplj9384rou0rmr2f8c6pmr0e09pcsi5@4ax.com>
 <Fbf7P.64696$oR74.58506@fx16.iad>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2024 16:58:04 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="87696454279a1fb524d9523074241586";
	logging-data="74368"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/As0eGD82GGAwztx9gfOVI"
User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Tw49k7JTUQ204+o5784aiGqzFwQ=
Bytes: 2645

On 2024-12-14, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
> Le 2024-12-13 à 19:35, Joel a écrit :
>> https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/intels-interim-co-ceo-claims-retailers-are-concerned-by-return-rate-of-qualcomm-powered-machines
>> 
>> 
>> Bottom line, people are having an issue with familiarity, returning a
>> Windows ARM device.  It didn't operate quite the same way.  Duh, it's
>> a good thing, it's superior tech for a laptop.  Don't just return it.

I think you (Joel) are kind of missing the point. The reason Microsoft has 
retained an almost monopoly status in the desktop OS market is because it 
runs the supposedly "necessary" Windows applications. I'm guessing the ARM 
CPU versions of Windows computers have limitations in this regard.

> Unlike Apple which made sure that its compatibility layer allowed most 
> existing software to continue working when they made the architecture 
> change (from 68000 to PowerPC, from PowerPC to Intel, from Intel to 
> ARM), Microsoft couldn't be bothered to do the same. They must have run 
> out of resources.

I think you're right. Microsoft is always trying to "catch up" on new trends 
without putting in the work and getting it right. They've got the "the 
customer is our beta tester" attitude. Looks like another case of doing a 
half-assed rollout is going bite them in the butt. 

-- 
“Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy 
what has been invented or made by the forces of good.”  —J.R.R. Tolkien