Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vjku0v$5rcl$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de>
Newsgroups: sci.logic
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2024 22:40:48 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 41
Message-ID: <vjku0v$5rcl$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me> <vg7vgh$csek$1@dont-email.me>
 <vg8911$dvd6$1@dont-email.me> <vjgvpc$3bb3f$1@dont-email.me>
 <vjh28r$3b6vi$4@dont-email.me> <vjjfmj$3tuuh$1@dont-email.me>
 <vjjgds$3tvsg$2@dont-email.me>
 <539edbdf516d69a3f1207687b802be7a86bd3b48@i2pn2.org>
 <vjk97t$1tms$1@dont-email.me>
 <c9e28c8c52f4885d550cd9c4083d9cf19331e572@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2024 22:40:48 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="046d7fae51030e0b0ef5ced8c293542c";
	logging-data="191893"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18blGUbUW2GlpC4yW2GxfpuGu07pEO53VQ="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:YMUonUEVBUBnBB3HHPYqelSiAUg=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <c9e28c8c52f4885d550cd9c4083d9cf19331e572@i2pn2.org>
Bytes: 3077

On 14.12.2024 19:53, Richard Damon wrote:
> On 12/14/24 10:46 AM, WM wrote:
>> On 14.12.2024 12:06, joes wrote:
>>> Am Sat, 14 Dec 2024 09:42:37 +0100 schrieb WM:
>>>> On 14.12.2024 09:30, Mikko wrote:
>>>>> On 2024-12-13 10:28:44 +0000, WM said:
>>>>>> On 13.12.2024 10:46, Mikko wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Between any two intervals there is space and that space contains
>>>>>>> other intervals.
>>>>>> No. Starting from a point in the complement the cursor will hit a
>>>>>> first interval. This is true for all visible intervals.
>>>>> False. From a point that is not a part of an interval no interval is
>>>>> the nearest one because another interval is nearer.
>>>> IF ALL intervals and their endpoints are existing as invariable points
>>>> on the real line this cannot happen. In potential infinity however
>>>> between any two points new intervals come into being.
>>> They are ALREADY there.
>>
>> Therefore they cannot appear after the cursor has passed their 
>> positions. Every interval and every end of an interval would be hit by 
>> the cursor.
>> 
> Where did the cursor come from in the first place?

It starts in the complement of the intervals of measure 3 covering 
rational numbers. If the cursor is thrown by chance, the chance is 3/oo 
= 0 that it hits an interval.
> 
> And why did it pass them when you tried to place t?

It passes an interval when it moves.
> 
> This is your old problem of there not being a "next" in a dense set.

In a geometry where all points exist, all points can be passed. But the 
set of intervals is not dense. It would be dense if all rationals were 
covered.

Regards, WM