Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vjl032$68i1$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2024 22:16:02 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 8 Message-ID: <vjl032$68i1$1@dont-email.me> References: <hikplj9384rou0rmr2f8c6pmr0e09pcsi5@4ax.com> <ls42suFfeshU4@mid.individual.net> <ndmpljh9c3nljm6qltc2kelgs06u4f94ng@4ax.com> <4gf7P.5896$Uup4.1220@fx10.iad> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2024 23:16:03 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="dd7dcedb5f199d2c5682951f77cb56f7"; logging-data="205377"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+1BPkfBiKJc/m4rrYgjkqL" User-Agent: Pan/0.161 (Chasiv Yar; ) Cancel-Lock: sha1:z7NGokpzQsENpmwd/ycDmJDZ4So= Bytes: 1540 On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 07:56:30 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote: > Higher performance per watt which leads to lower power use and therefore > improved battery life. Whether Intel and AMD want to admit it or not, > people _do_ want to have a computer which can handle a whole day's work > on a single charge and which won't increase electrical bills. Sure. But Windows can never give it to them.