Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vjl032$68i1$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have
 high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2024 22:16:02 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 8
Message-ID: <vjl032$68i1$1@dont-email.me>
References: <hikplj9384rou0rmr2f8c6pmr0e09pcsi5@4ax.com>
	<ls42suFfeshU4@mid.individual.net>
	<ndmpljh9c3nljm6qltc2kelgs06u4f94ng@4ax.com> <4gf7P.5896$Uup4.1220@fx10.iad>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2024 23:16:03 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="dd7dcedb5f199d2c5682951f77cb56f7";
	logging-data="205377"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+1BPkfBiKJc/m4rrYgjkqL"
User-Agent: Pan/0.161 (Chasiv Yar; )
Cancel-Lock: sha1:z7NGokpzQsENpmwd/ycDmJDZ4So=
Bytes: 1540

On Sat, 14 Dec 2024 07:56:30 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote:

> Higher performance per watt which leads to lower power use and therefore
> improved battery life. Whether Intel and AMD want to admit it or not,
> people _do_ want to have a computer which can handle a whole day's work
> on a single charge and which won't increase electrical bills.

Sure. But Windows can never give it to them.