| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vjl6pn$7egm$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv Subject: Re: What Did You Watch? 2024-12-13 (Friday) Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2024 00:10:31 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 62 Message-ID: <vjl6pn$7egm$1@dont-email.me> References: <UBI20241213@dont-email.me> <vjkfok$38fh$1@dont-email.me> <vjkn90$4i8i$2@dont-email.me> <vjksp7$5nrq$2@dont-email.me> Injection-Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2024 01:10:32 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e401c6000b7d68e5367d8343df2879c8"; logging-data="244246"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+ruZr+8Aj/ZLBLj1U31MQ6eBPrioOhPWE=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:HXTb+XpaHNhcWNXOKEvpJGnLgrw= X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010) Bytes: 4512 Arthur Lipscomb <arthur@alum.calberkeley.org> wrote: >On 12/14/2024 11:45 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote: >> Arthur Lipscomb <arthur@alum.calberkeley.org> wrote: >> >>> The End (theatrical) New movie, in what I'm assuming is a new genre, >>> "apocalyptic musical." The movie stars Tilda Swinton as "Mother" and >>> Michael Shannon as "Father" who along with their son, "son" (George >>> MacKay) and a few other people live in a massive underground shelter >>> following some unspecific global apocalypse. One day their world is >>> shattered when a young woman, "Girl" (Moses Ingram) makes her way into >>> their shelter, and then selfishly doesn't want to be thrown out to die. >>> Instead she insists she be allowed to stay in their shelter which has an >>> abundance of food and resources. Mother just can't have this sort of >>> nonsense, but Son realizing Girl may be the only other female left on >>> Earth, or at least that he will ever have access too, wants her to stay. >> >>> This movie takes a page out of another Tilda Swinton apocalyptic movie, >>> "Snowpiercer" and serves as an allegory for the class system. Mother >>> and Husband are portrayed as wealthy and out of touch with reality. >>> They are clinging on to a way of life that is long gone, and are trying >>> to maintain a class system with the other people in the shelter treated >>> more like employees than fellow survivors. And for whatever reason >>> everyone just accepts this way of life. Also the movie focuses on how >>> Father and mother are both desperate to literally rewrite history in the >>> eyes of Son. >> >> There's a reason why Hollywood writers are unqualified to teach >> econmics. Unless the wealthy did something unjust to make others poor, >> then Girl isn't entitled to share the wealth. >> >> If workers are performing valuable work and being compensated in a >> barter arrangement, that's called a "market". The shelter isn't a free >> market but everyone should be entitled to share in what's produced via >> collective activity. No one is entitled to simply grab any wealth others >> brought into the shelter pre-apocolypse. >> > >This isn't Atlas Shrugged. There is no "market" and no divine right to >rule by birthright. And no wealth to grab. It's just people living in >an underground shelter. And now that I think about it, there's nothing >to indicate the rich people didn't just show up, murder the original >occupants and take the shelter for themselves. There were a few lines >of dialogue about the shelter explicitly being designed to house far >more people, but "Mother" and "Father" had long ago decided to keep >everyone else out so they could have the shelter for themselves. Ah. That's an important point. They are evil. >>> That being said, I don't want to make this movie sound better than it >>> actually is. "Snowpiercer" is a great movie. "The End," not so much. >>> There is no reason for it to be a musical, and the songs, while OK, are >>> not memorable. I don't recall a single song from this movie, I watched >>> it last night! The overall movie just screams pretentious arthouse >>> film. Which *is* what it is. It's worth watching maybe once, perhaps >>> paired with Snowpiercer, but beyond that I don't see much replay value >>> in it. >> >>> If I ever did watch it again, it would *have* to be paired with >>> Snowpiercer, so I could at least see Swinton essentially playing the >>> same character in two different apocalyptic movies. >> >> Transfer it to nitrate film stock.