| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vjme5p$htj9$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: Audio mixing and distribution Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2024 04:22:33 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 12 Message-ID: <vjme5p$htj9$1@dont-email.me> References: <vjknp7$4m23$2@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2024 12:22:35 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4b2770a5e326ce6338cdca0fbd4c57cd"; logging-data="587369"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18qmvOwxV5878pTNIdNCk2t" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2 Cancel-Lock: sha1:LEl30wqoUR4stC7PBJbdut0YsB0= In-Reply-To: <vjknp7$4m23$2@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US On 12/14/2024 12:54 PM, Don Y wrote: > Additionally, if the sinks are multichannel, is it best to > provide a follower for each channel so they can be independantly > set (vs. a "balance" of sorts). > > [Think about why it is NOT done that way in consumer kit] Skip that. I threw together a small app to let my "test subjects" play with different approaches. Though I suspect I already know what their preference will be...