Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vjmgq0$igk3$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2024 07:07:28 -0500 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 35 Message-ID: <vjmgq0$igk3$1@dont-email.me> References: <hikplj9384rou0rmr2f8c6pmr0e09pcsi5@4ax.com> <ls42suFfeshU4@mid.individual.net> <ndmpljh9c3nljm6qltc2kelgs06u4f94ng@4ax.com> <ls4ljkFig06U2@mid.individual.net> <gFf7P.2571$qu83.702@fx35.iad> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2024 13:07:28 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="302178e5e7bc0ba75858b2108e6645f4"; logging-data="606851"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/KONSQXN1Uct2xDi+Nig5Ar9bMIA7MbwA=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:Vng/RBGBF76D6McwqK/p6AtVGZY= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <gFf7P.2571$qu83.702@fx35.iad> Bytes: 2806 On 12/14/24 8:23 AM, CrudeSausage wrote: > ... > People probably don't need 24-hour battery life, but they will be > thrilled to have it either way. My gaming laptop boasted of ten-hour > battery life when I got it and it can definitely do that if you don't > use the horrible software ASUS provides you by default... My take is that a "long hours" laptop life needs to not be BS in order to actually be of benefit. I can recall getting a new Thinkpad at work at one point which bragged about 8 hours ... and when just running MS-Office stuff, reality was more like 2.5 hours. > However, notice that I was apprehensive about the laptop having enough > battery life for the task despite knowing that it can usually handle ten > hours without issue. My habit of keeping the machine plugged makes me > fear not having the adapter around. Meanwhile, when I had a MacBook Air > M1, I was so used to not having an adapter around that I wouldn't have > feared not having enough battery life. Once you experience the latter, > you get addicted to it and don't want to return to a life where you feel > it necessary to lug around anything other than the laptop itself. The > battery life of machines is indeed going to be a major selling point in > the very near future. Agreed. Apple's M hardware machines are already there. Its now up to the WinTel world to catch up... ....and for Linux too, if they've not done a good job porting their OS & Apps to the Apple M architecture. -hh