Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vjmgq0$igk3$1@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have
 high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2024 07:07:28 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 35
Message-ID: <vjmgq0$igk3$1@dont-email.me>
References: <hikplj9384rou0rmr2f8c6pmr0e09pcsi5@4ax.com>
 <ls42suFfeshU4@mid.individual.net>
 <ndmpljh9c3nljm6qltc2kelgs06u4f94ng@4ax.com>
 <ls4ljkFig06U2@mid.individual.net> <gFf7P.2571$qu83.702@fx35.iad>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2024 13:07:28 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="302178e5e7bc0ba75858b2108e6645f4";
	logging-data="606851"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/KONSQXN1Uct2xDi+Nig5Ar9bMIA7MbwA="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Vng/RBGBF76D6McwqK/p6AtVGZY=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <gFf7P.2571$qu83.702@fx35.iad>
Bytes: 2806

On 12/14/24 8:23 AM, CrudeSausage wrote:
> ...
> People probably don't need 24-hour battery life, but they will be 
> thrilled to have it either way. My gaming laptop boasted of ten-hour 
> battery life when I got it and it can definitely do that if you don't 
> use the horrible software ASUS provides you by default...


My take is that a "long hours" laptop life needs to not be BS in order 
to actually be of benefit.  I can recall getting a new Thinkpad at work 
at one point which bragged about 8 hours ... and when just running 
MS-Office stuff, reality was more like 2.5 hours.

> However, notice that I was apprehensive about the laptop having enough 
> battery life for the task despite knowing that it can usually handle ten 
> hours without issue. My habit of keeping the machine plugged makes me 
> fear not having the adapter around. Meanwhile, when I had a MacBook Air 
> M1, I was so used to not having an adapter around that I wouldn't have 
> feared not having enough battery life. Once you experience the latter, 
> you get addicted to it and don't want to return to a life where you feel 
> it necessary to lug around anything other than the laptop itself. The 
> battery life of machines is indeed going to be a major selling point in 
> the very near future.

Agreed.  Apple's M hardware machines are already there.  Its now up to 
the WinTel world to catch up...

....and for Linux too, if they've not done a good job porting their OS & 
Apps to the Apple M architecture.


-hh