Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <vjnbin$lspo$3@dont-email.me>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vjnbin$lspo$3@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article 
Path: eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de>
Newsgroups: sci.logic
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
 (extra-ordinary)
Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2024 20:44:23 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <vjnbin$lspo$3@dont-email.me>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me> <vhs4ue$1ku9t$1@dont-email.me>
 <vhv6or$280s6$1@dont-email.me> <vhvbjb$28n6o$1@dont-email.me>
 <vi1dbj$2moon$1@dont-email.me> <vi224l$2pgrd$1@dont-email.me>
 <vi4383$3csd4$2@dont-email.me> <vi4a6c$3dt4s$2@dont-email.me>
 <vi6p1l$3uoti$1@dont-email.me> <vi6unr$3v0dn$5@dont-email.me>
 <vihd3l$2d9fk$1@dont-email.me> <vihfai$2cnof$1@dont-email.me>
 <vijrru$37ce1$1@dont-email.me> <vikh9k$3cua3$1@dont-email.me>
 <viml28$6j3$1@dont-email.me> <0b1bb1a1-40e3-464f-9e3d-a5ac22dfdc6f@tha.de>
 <95183b4d9c2e32651963bac79965313ad2bfe7e8@i2pn2.org>
 <vj6vhh$elqh$2@dont-email.me>
 <33512b63716ac263c16b7d64cd1d77578c8aea9d@i2pn2.org>
 <vj9s4i$11a3p$1@dont-email.me> <vjam6d$1700v$1@dont-email.me>
 <vjc65g$1i9vk$3@dont-email.me> <vjf7kl$2s7e5$1@dont-email.me>
 <vjfmq3$2upa9$3@dont-email.me> <vjjh0o$3u5ec$1@dont-email.me>
 <vjjkds$3ukck$1@dont-email.me> <vjmd21$hq8s$1@dont-email.me>
 <vjmepr$hk44$2@dont-email.me>
 <aa42107d707ba33ffeca0d8788beb98043794604@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2024 20:44:24 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="183e791f780bef0461f3ddd5d4b33261";
	logging-data="717624"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/K6+DJTsPtwsMV6d1W78RH5sbogonCJWc="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:8CwJyRNlubKne7yJ/pm3cHDgq9g=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <aa42107d707ba33ffeca0d8788beb98043794604@i2pn2.org>

On 15.12.2024 13:54, Richard Damon wrote:
>
> You can't "name" your dark numbers,

because they are dark.

> You already admitted that the set of definable natural numbers was in 
> fact the set of all natural numbers,

No.

 > so there is nothing left to be dark

|ℕ \ {1, 2, 3, ...}| = 0 cannot be accomplished by visible numbers 
because ∀n ∈ ℕ_def: |ℕ \ {1, 2, 3, ..., n}| = ℵo.

Regards, WM