Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<vjp3fa$13ks6$2@dont-email.me>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc
Subject: Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ?
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 11:38:18 +0000
Organization: A little, after lunch
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <vjp3fa$13ks6$2@dont-email.me>
References: <o4ucnYo2YLqmZ876nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <vj1m3f$33eu5$16@dont-email.me> <947j2lx3qf.ln2@Telcontar.valinor>
 <lrolhlFkmd2U1@mid.individual.net> <vj77pi$f8rj$9@dont-email.me>
 <24ffec92-9486-251d-7a42-d376b88b2c9b@example.net>
 <20241209135847.00004fb7@gmail.com> <lrpjjpFpep6U1@mid.individual.net>
 <G5mdnXqNwMsTeMr6nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <a2247e79-41bd-a62e-1196-b12cd9385b96@example.net>
 <qmCdnbXw77vmtcT6nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <9639150c-d17c-bb50-a5f4-20ff82e00513@example.net>
 <XuudnU5lgcgP_cf6nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <4b3cb76c-7e84-4357-026f-61375788e6f2@example.net>
 <s7udndLqfcN8K8b6nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <e3dcac8a-14a2-6cba-d8dc-8a079184c045@example.net>
 <20241213083212.000050d0@gmail.com> <vjhnng$3gkob$2@dont-email.me>
 <kOidnfoq2O4TZMH6nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <ls4m2rFig06U3@mid.individual.net>
 <JUKdnSwFa9hH_MP6nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@earthlink.com>
 <vjmcbb$hgj4$1@dont-email.me> <ls8npdF7o5dU5@mid.individual.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 12:38:19 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a27949d11006c93782ad207ff43714c1";
	logging-data="1168262"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+5f8CTP/2CGistD1DLsR0nzx00Y0YAnEw="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:J6d6+pCY+hnP0ob1CaBtAbwVwz0=
Content-Language: en-GB
In-Reply-To: <ls8npdF7o5dU5@mid.individual.net>
Bytes: 3098

On 15/12/2024 19:08, rbowman wrote:
> On Sun, 15 Dec 2024 10:51:23 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote:
> 
>> In general it is cheaper to simply scrap that one, or if it escapes into
>> the wild, give the customer a replacement.
> 
> As I have mentioned my engineering statistics course devoted a lot of time
> to determining that point. QA is expensive.

Yup. I bought a US Robotics modem  for domestic use. Lifetime guarantee. 
My telephone line got a *direct strike*.

USR replaced  it.

At some level it is not worth arguing over.

I bought 6 highball glasses off Amazon. They sent lager glasses. I 
complained, they sent 6 highball glasses and said 'keep the lager glasses'.


The admin work involved in processing returns is often greater than the 
cost of a replacement products and the cost of QA is ultimately 
exorbitant. In the end a statistical approach is used.

I know. I used to design Mil Spec hardware where we had a giant chest 
freezer to take all the kit down to -25°C to ensure it still worked.



-- 
Canada is all right really, though not for the whole weekend.

"Saki"