| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<vjp3fa$13ks6$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 11:38:18 +0000 Organization: A little, after lunch Lines: 34 Message-ID: <vjp3fa$13ks6$2@dont-email.me> References: <o4ucnYo2YLqmZ876nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@earthlink.com> <vj1m3f$33eu5$16@dont-email.me> <947j2lx3qf.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <lrolhlFkmd2U1@mid.individual.net> <vj77pi$f8rj$9@dont-email.me> <24ffec92-9486-251d-7a42-d376b88b2c9b@example.net> <20241209135847.00004fb7@gmail.com> <lrpjjpFpep6U1@mid.individual.net> <G5mdnXqNwMsTeMr6nZ2dnZfqnPSdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <a2247e79-41bd-a62e-1196-b12cd9385b96@example.net> <qmCdnbXw77vmtcT6nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@earthlink.com> <9639150c-d17c-bb50-a5f4-20ff82e00513@example.net> <XuudnU5lgcgP_cf6nZ2dnZfqn_idnZ2d@earthlink.com> <4b3cb76c-7e84-4357-026f-61375788e6f2@example.net> <s7udndLqfcN8K8b6nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@earthlink.com> <e3dcac8a-14a2-6cba-d8dc-8a079184c045@example.net> <20241213083212.000050d0@gmail.com> <vjhnng$3gkob$2@dont-email.me> <kOidnfoq2O4TZMH6nZ2dnZfqnPednZ2d@earthlink.com> <ls4m2rFig06U3@mid.individual.net> <JUKdnSwFa9hH_MP6nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@earthlink.com> <vjmcbb$hgj4$1@dont-email.me> <ls8npdF7o5dU5@mid.individual.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 12:38:19 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a27949d11006c93782ad207ff43714c1"; logging-data="1168262"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+5f8CTP/2CGistD1DLsR0nzx00Y0YAnEw=" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Cancel-Lock: sha1:J6d6+pCY+hnP0ob1CaBtAbwVwz0= Content-Language: en-GB In-Reply-To: <ls8npdF7o5dU5@mid.individual.net> Bytes: 3098 On 15/12/2024 19:08, rbowman wrote: > On Sun, 15 Dec 2024 10:51:23 +0000, The Natural Philosopher wrote: > >> In general it is cheaper to simply scrap that one, or if it escapes into >> the wild, give the customer a replacement. > > As I have mentioned my engineering statistics course devoted a lot of time > to determining that point. QA is expensive. Yup. I bought a US Robotics modem for domestic use. Lifetime guarantee. My telephone line got a *direct strike*. USR replaced it. At some level it is not worth arguing over. I bought 6 highball glasses off Amazon. They sent lager glasses. I complained, they sent 6 highball glasses and said 'keep the lager glasses'. The admin work involved in processing returns is often greater than the cost of a replacement products and the cost of QA is ultimately exorbitant. In the end a statistical approach is used. I know. I used to design Mil Spec hardware where we had a giant chest freezer to take all the kit down to -25°C to ensure it still worked. -- Canada is all right really, though not for the whole weekend. "Saki"