Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vjq698$1adh4$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.xs3.de!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.killfile.org!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail From: MarkE <me22over7@gmail.com> Newsgroups: talk.origins Subject: Re: Irony Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 08:32:24 +1100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 70 Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org Message-ID: <vjq698$1adh4$1@dont-email.me> References: <vjog9f$10qp7$1@dont-email.me> <vjpson$1899g$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89"; logging-data="48295"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:p3ABNFmHu6vmeyiOlFcCcB2bv04= Return-Path: <news@eternal-september.org> X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org id 1C70D229782; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 16:32:37 -0500 (EST) by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 99561229765 for <talk-origins@ediacara.org>; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 16:32:34 -0500 (EST) by pi-dach.dorfdsl.de (8.18.1/8.18.1/Debian-6~bpo12+1) with ESMTPS id 4BGLWS5K1302200 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 22:32:30 +0100 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.eternal-september.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BC755FD3B for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 21:32:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: name/0BC755FD3B; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com id 8D4D0DC01A9; Mon, 16 Dec 2024 22:32:25 +0100 (CET) X-Injection-Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2024 22:32:25 +0100 (CET) Content-Language: en-US X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX1+sE5UFfpwgJPHw9VmlOsuZ3q65EFK+mDI= In-Reply-To: <vjpson$1899g$1@dont-email.me> HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_IN_WELCOMELIST,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 smtp.eternal-september.org Bytes: 5425 On 17/12/2024 5:50 am, Ernest Major wrote: > On 16/12/2024 06:10, MarkE wrote: >> I've raised Steven Benner's "tar paradox" in a recent post; it >> subsequently occurred to me that the Miller-Urey experiment is, >> ironically, a demonstration of this (I've mentioned this in a another >> thread, but thought it deserved a separate post). Miller-Urey produced >> only unusable small/trace amounts of amino acids in a "tar" mixture: >> >> Breakdown of products: >> * Carboxylic Acids (e.g., formic acid, acetic acid, and succinic >> acid): These dominated the product mix, typically making up 80-90% of >> the total organic compounds. > > Not tar. I found a Miller & Urey paper. > >> * Hydroxy Acids (e.g., lactic acid and glycolic acid): Accounted for >> 5-10% of the total. > > Not tar. > >> * Amino Acids: Typically contributed about 1-2% of the total organic >> product yield. > > Not tar. Also the numbers you give below add up to ~4.5%. The number > from a Miller and Urey paper I found give an every larger proportion (by > mole) of amino acids, and carboxylic acids in the 50-60% range. > >> * Other Organic Molecules: Small amounts of urea, nitriles, aldehydes, >> and hydrocarbons were also formed, constituting the remainder of the >> products. > > Not tar. >> >> Relative concentrations of amino acids produced: >> - Glycine: Approximately 2.1% of the total yield >> - Alanine: Around 1.7% >> - β-Alanine: About 0.76% >> - Aspartic Acid: Approximately 0.024% >> - Glutamic Acid: Around 0.051% > > I had thought that the Miller-Urey experiment did produce appreciable > quantities of tar. Was I mistaken? > I think so. "Miller’s experiment did produce the amino acids, but only by continuously circulating the reaction mixture and isolating products as they were formed. The quantities were still tiny and not in the same proportions as found in nature. One of the causes of the low yield has been identified by Peltzer who worked with Miller. As the amino acids were formed they reacted with reducing sugars in the Maillard reaction, forming a *brown tar* around Miller's apparatus. Ultimately, Miller was producing large compounds called mellanoids, with amino acids as an intermediate product." Or this: "Little discussed by anyone outside the origins of life scientific community was that the experiment also produced a lot of a dark, sticky substance, a gooey tar that covered the beaker’s insides. It was dismissed as largely unimportant and regrettable then, and in the thousands of parallel origins of life experiments that followed. Though they do offer this glimmer: "Today, however, some intrepid researchers are looking at the tarry residue in a different light." https://manyworlds.space/2017/09/21/messy-chemistry-a-new-way-to-approach-the-origin-of-life/