Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: The Mystery Drones
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 02:54:19 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 33
Message-ID: <vjqp4r$1djtk$2@dont-email.me>
References: <1734078163-1263@newsgrouper.org.uk> <lNCdnVt6ppI89cL6nZ2dnZfqn_YAAAAA@giganews.com> <vjqbam$1basf$1@dont-email.me> <h9c1mj968k7v2bat9rdvhls0oq8l54l95k@4ax.com>
Injection-Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 03:54:20 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ffafafb8d179ed0262982f2eeacc5013";
	logging-data="1494964"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+2c23qeFC7v91X9fOpfNbplMswQqO8EWA="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:YWeZXOnhPbcTv2R+SP3EGL4X//M=
X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test77 (Sep 1, 2010)
Bytes: 2275

shawn  <nanoflower@notforg.m.a.i.l.com> wrote:
>On Mon, 16 Dec 2024 22:58:30 -0000 (UTC), "Adam H. Kerman"
><ahk@chinet.com> wrote:
>
>>BTR1701 <no_email@invalid.invalid> wrote:
>>>super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
>>>>On 2024-12-14 23:17:19 +0000, shawn said:
>>
>>>>>So it seems likely it is a government operation that the government
>>>>>isn't ready to admit is theirs. As you say the military has plenty of
>>>>>facilities that could have been used to test the drones in secret so
>>>>>there must be a reason to fly the drones in a very public manner.
>>
>>>>>My guess is we will see an official deployment next year.
>>
>>>>Big Daddy has already committed to shooting them down so we'll know if 
>>>>it's a US government operation soon.
>>
>>>>If they suddenly disappear he'll claim he scared them out of the skies.
>>
>>>>However one would think he's getting the same security briefings as 
>>>>Biden at this point -- whether Biden consents or not.
>>
>>>It's not up to Biden. He has no say in it. The U.S. Code specifies that a
>>>president-elect receive the same intelligence and diplomatic briefings as
>>>the sitting president.
>>
>>Doesn't the presidential nominee receive briefings? Thought I remembered
>>that from The West Wing.
>
>Isn't that what BTR1701 just said? . . . 

No.