Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vjqvab$1i1a9$2@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Rich <rich@example.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.misc Subject: Re: Remember "Bit-Slice" Chips ? Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 04:39:39 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 48 Message-ID: <vjqvab$1i1a9$2@dont-email.me> References: <o4ucnYo2YLqmZ876nZ2dnZfqn_adnZ2d@earthlink.com> <vjheae$3el37$1@dont-email.me> <5695a5d7-ef0b-3fdd-6993-fb421d182aed@example.net> <ls63nbFprrqU2@mid.individual.net> <1502c51c-09c4-5b06-6d43-9e0d1effca5d@example.net> <ls6qn7Ft2anU3@mid.individual.net> <329ccded-4b7a-f553-581c-75a03252c206@example.net> <vjnh2n$o9kj$2@dont-email.me> <4e08a3f2-58ef-541b-0b52-aac1932bd709@example.net> <IGSdndNnL-UdXcL6nZ2dnZfqn_udnZ2d@earthlink.com> <3ff382bb-da10-68dc-7e8a-0cdbe4056509@example.net> Injection-Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 05:39:40 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="876264b18c00e4986a1fe1d9ed3feb32"; logging-data="1639753"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18Jnf3ItQybumrJfZBE8pV8" User-Agent: tin/2.6.1-20211226 ("Convalmore") (Linux/5.15.139 (x86_64)) Cancel-Lock: sha1:c5nks3FZ4CgR9zhiwzjDW2A3mPY= Bytes: 3848 D <nospam@example.net> wrote: > > > On Mon, 16 Dec 2024, 186282@ud0s4.net wrote: > >>> This is a very good point! I read today that a 21 day ban on smartphones in >>> UK schools resulted in better psychological health/well being, and better >>> sleep, and a 3% memory improvement. >> >> Today's kiddies are plagued by 'social' and political >> BS which constantly tries to twist their brains into >> knots. For SM it means PROFIT ... for political interests >> it's produced a gen of near-psychotics which can be >> twisted around the proverbial finger. > > This is the truth. I see it in the class room every single day. If the exam is > hard, they would never dream of working harder or study more. Instead they > complain to the school that the teacher is evil, and refuse to take the exam > until it is made easier. I wonder how some of these pansies would have responded to the digital logic design exams I had long ago in university. The prof. told everyone the rules up front: open book, open notes, and the kicker: an exam suitable for a 70min period, but we had 50min to take it. After the first one, I worked out why the "70min in 50min time slot". The digital logic design problems that were suitable for a pencil and paper exam had a hard complexity knee at about the 4-5 bits point. 4-5 bits or less and one could solve the Karnaugh maps on paper by hand. And even 5 bits was 'pushing it', paper complexity wise. Anything beyond was in the realm of "you now need a computer solver for this". So all the problems on the exams ended up being /easy enough/ (relatively speaking) that 50min of problems in 50min of exam time meant that nearly the entire class would score 95+ (out of 100). So to separate out those who truly understood from those just getting by required "too many problems" to solve in time. The good students had no problem finishing a 70min exam in 50 minutes and scoring 95+ on them (myself and another classmate named Scott proved that fact). The "ok" students would get most of the exam done, and score in the 75-90 range. And the actual mediocre students would be the ones scoring the sub 75 scores because they cracked open the book (and if you needed to crack open the book, it meant you were not going to score well on the exam, making the whole "open book, open note" rule moot). There was bitching and moaning on the part of the mediocre students after each exam, but nothing changed because of their bitching and moaning.