Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
 (extra-ordinary)
Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 22:46:40 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 18
Message-ID: <vjsrg0$1tr00$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me> <vi4383$3csd4$2@dont-email.me>
 <vi4a6c$3dt4s$2@dont-email.me> <vi6p1l$3uoti$1@dont-email.me>
 <vi6unr$3v0dn$5@dont-email.me> <vihd3l$2d9fk$1@dont-email.me>
 <vihfai$2cnof$1@dont-email.me> <vijrru$37ce1$1@dont-email.me>
 <vikh9k$3cua3$1@dont-email.me> <viml28$6j3$1@dont-email.me>
 <0b1bb1a1-40e3-464f-9e3d-a5ac22dfdc6f@tha.de>
 <95183b4d9c2e32651963bac79965313ad2bfe7e8@i2pn2.org>
 <vj6vhh$elqh$2@dont-email.me>
 <33512b63716ac263c16b7d64cd1d77578c8aea9d@i2pn2.org>
 <vj9s4i$11a3p$1@dont-email.me> <vjam6d$1700v$1@dont-email.me>
 <vjc65g$1i9vk$3@dont-email.me> <vjf7kl$2s7e5$1@dont-email.me>
 <vjfmq3$2upa9$3@dont-email.me> <vjjh0o$3u5ec$1@dont-email.me>
 <vjjkds$3ukck$1@dont-email.me> <vjmd21$hq8s$1@dont-email.me>
 <vjmepr$hk44$2@dont-email.me>
 <323257d7133cbe48708dfbbd509db649e3a60ad4@i2pn2.org>
 <vjms98$k2go$1@dont-email.me>
 <8db1dfa800f192789aac1bc80f6994038e9010c3@i2pn2.org>
 <vjoorp$11n0g$3@dont-email.me>
 <7df56e42802228fa15faf80360dcc597698db329@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2024 22:46:41 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="acd6e6aac9a4524fb309aaa38e5ddcd3";
	logging-data="2026496"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19oIR8Nc5ny+yzfGt5w8JuzYdzIMo1IoAY="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:ikpHWtkUEFLdQA/ZNJ+Lj36mhUM=
In-Reply-To: <7df56e42802228fa15faf80360dcc597698db329@i2pn2.org>
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 2581

On 17.12.2024 12:14, joes wrote:
> Am Mon, 16 Dec 2024 09:37:13 +0100 schrieb WM:

> You don’t. You only ever apply a finite number (except in the limit).

I apply all natural numbers k ∈ ℕ which Cantor applies. In both cases 
there is no limit.

>> Cantor
>> applies only finite k and claims that none remains unused (as the
>> content of all endsegments).
> Cantor applies the infinite set.

How would he apply the infinite set? Please explain why you think that 
he applies more than all k ∈ ℕ.

Regards, WM