Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vjtodv$262og$4@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Intel's co-CEO claims retailers say Qualcomm-powered PCs have high return rates, points to new competitors with Arm chips coming in 2025 Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 06:00:32 -0000 (UTC) Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 7 Message-ID: <vjtodv$262og$4@dont-email.me> References: <hikplj9384rou0rmr2f8c6pmr0e09pcsi5@4ax.com> <ls42suFfeshU4@mid.individual.net> <ndmpljh9c3nljm6qltc2kelgs06u4f94ng@4ax.com> <4gf7P.5896$Uup4.1220@fx10.iad> <vjk95h$28k0$1@dont-email.me> <rEj7P.2573$qu83.2465@fx35.iad> <vjm05a$fm6k$1@dont-email.me> <ilC7P.2844$vfee.1442@fx45.iad> <vjova6$134en$2@dont-email.me> <c7Y7P.71530$oR74.29957@fx16.iad> <vjrbqo$1l8iu$3@dont-email.me> <rrf8P.12967$DPl.11267@fx13.iad> <vjsn1q$1sthq$2@dont-email.me> <Pon8P.23226$EYNf.22658@fx11.iad> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 07:00:33 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9ed5d2960e91ad91a8c092c667dd3279"; logging-data="2296592"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/CFvYaNfm4jRn9sfVRMOz6" User-Agent: Pan/0.161 (Chasiv Yar; ) Cancel-Lock: sha1:fvzBmFnq8EVZccylYbNeFJRW+Qo= Bytes: 1829 On Tue, 17 Dec 2024 18:01:02 -0500, CrudeSausage wrote: > ARM being low-power doesn't mean that it is low-performance. Fujitsu’s chips are proof of that <https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/fujitsu-flaunts-144-core-monaka-cpu-2nm-and-5nm-chiplets-soic-and-cowos-packaging>. And without the upgradeability limitations of Apple, too.