Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.sys.raspberry-pi
Subject: Re: OT: horrible 8086 segmentation
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 06:24:01 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 7
Message-ID: <vjtpq0$26amh$2@dont-email.me>
References: <vi2cdh$2t0i8$1@dont-email.me> <lqmf9uF4bggU1@mid.individual.net>
	<vi70eo$3vogk$8@dont-email.me> <uI32P.9414$_Zee.9155@fx39.iad>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 07:24:01 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9ed5d2960e91ad91a8c092c667dd3279";
	logging-data="2304721"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/rY8eUahBWpFmCuT438vw5"
User-Agent: Pan/0.161 (Chasiv Yar; )
Cancel-Lock: sha1:NBc7S7J1pNm2PxX6vB62lYe+p3k=
Bytes: 1317

On Thu, 28 Nov 2024 19:42:18 GMT, Charlie Gibbs wrote:

> Intel put the "backward" in "backward compatible".

I recall the term “backward combatible” used to describe the feelings of 
violence some people had towards the requirement for backward 
compatibility with certain kinds of brain death ...