Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vju9j4$1ekba$1@solani.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> Newsgroups: misc.phone.mobile.iphone,comp.mobile.android Subject: Re: RCS is not more private and secure than texting according to the FBI Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 10:53:24 -0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <vju9j4$1ekba$1@solani.org> References: <vjr55k$1cnf1$1@solani.org> <p8d83lxd5u.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <vjs73v$1053j$1@solani.org> <lseg87F71r1U5@mid.individual.net> <hqg93lxoaa.ln2@Telcontar.valinor> <vjtt7c$10upe$1@solani.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 10:53:24 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: solani.org; logging-data="1528170"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org" User-Agent: NewsTap/5.5 (iPhone/iPod Touch) Cancel-Lock: sha1:TyZGwPdNZgqKUq6MXgdno80rvu4= sha1:BpLz+NgF6Zgk1Eya229Usa2LnBo= X-User-ID: eJwFwQcBwEAIBDBLrGPIeaD4l9AE6uwT5nDD4b4Nid7+tgsIvklKYdHqaTpVTsfqq4LNiueJLVOTXuXj+gFcpBU5 Bytes: 2376 Lines: 31 Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> wrote: > On 18.12.24 01:15, Carlos E.R. wrote: >> On 2024-12-18 00:36, Arno Welzel wrote: >>> Jörg Lorenz, 2024-12-17 16:58: >>> >>>> On 17.12.24 15:08, Carlos E.R. wrote: >>>>> On 2024-12-17 07:19, Jörg Lorenz wrote: >>>>>> Avoid to use RCS! >>>>> >>>>> If an iPhone is involved. It's fine on Android. The article you posted >>>>> says so. >>>> >>>> You do not understand what happens. >>>> RCS is Google's wet dream. Nobody needs it or wants it. >>> >>> RCS works fine - much better than MMS ever was. Google just added a >>> proprietary encryption to it. >> >> Proprietary, maybe, but they did not block Apple from using it. It was >> Apple who decided not even to try using it. Ok, it is not an standard, >> but it exists, it is there, ready to use. Just use, then agree into an >> standard, and implement it next. > > That is naive. Proprietary and encryption are a contradiction. > And you do not seem to understand the powerplay of big tech. > > By being dismissive and haughty, you are demonstrating that it is you who does not understand anything. You’ve already been invited to educate us, so do that. But we know you are more ignorant than anyone else here.