Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<vk1i0m$2ua1q$1@dont-email.me> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.xs3.de!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail From: Mark Isaak <specimenNOSPAM@curioustaxon.omy.net> Newsgroups: talk.origins Subject: Re: Ool - out at first base? Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 08:35:34 -0800 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 46 Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org Message-ID: <vk1i0m$2ua1q$1@dont-email.me> References: <vjak6b$16l6r$1@dont-email.me> <vjhjul$3fj8c$1@dont-email.me> <d9754db8-9c88-40c4-8376-162d08f2f7d5@gmail.com> <vjj5q5$3scn7$1@dont-email.me> <ghgqljhmg67bcn07hr65h7el42s8bcr39a@4ax.com> <vjjoip$3vd3m$1@dont-email.me> <8gqqljd2at10o4dc137avfugiscjg91g7g@4ax.com> <vjjs8c$1cp$1@dont-email.me> <cu4rlj5lvme1gekehdb1df37c1llon6fto@4ax.com> <vjln70$di5m$1@dont-email.me> <n73tljhrs67n2dfa8ablfc6obgrnm2qn5f@4ax.com> <vjmhs4$ijml$2@dont-email.me> <puqtljpfr6i6fs7ctorh845qke5eves91q@4ax.com> <vjo6a8$vgg8$1@dont-email.me> <vjpvag$18913$3@dont-email.me> <vjt7i9$1vman$2@dont-email.me> <vjusg6$2c1uh$1@dont-email.me> <vk08k8$2ndnn$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89"; logging-data="50943"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:Gw0STQg5IOPqlOEkcNiEjxc0BYc= Return-Path: <news@eternal-september.org> X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org id 60E78229782; Thu, 19 Dec 2024 11:35:44 -0500 (EST) by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35370229765 for <talk-origins@ediacara.org>; Thu, 19 Dec 2024 11:35:42 -0500 (EST) by moderators.individual.net (Exim 4.98) for talk-origins@moderators.isc.org with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (envelope-from <news@eternal-september.org>) id 1tOJUw-00000001guA-0sGh; Thu, 19 Dec 2024 17:35:38 +0100 (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.eternal-september.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A69F95F8CF for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Thu, 19 Dec 2024 16:35:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: name/A69F95F8CF; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=curioustaxon.omy.net id 5618ADC01A9; Thu, 19 Dec 2024 17:35:35 +0100 (CET) X-Injection-Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 17:35:35 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX1+olf79FLpHr0nuNasV+IV8l7aq5Znypa8= In-Reply-To: <vk08k8$2ndnn$1@dont-email.me> Content-Language: en-US tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_SAFE_BLOCKED, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_IN_WELCOMELIST,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 smtp.eternal-september.org Bytes: 5060 On 12/18/24 8:49 PM, MarkE wrote: > On 19/12/2024 3:16 am, Mark Isaak wrote: >> On 12/17/24 5:12 PM, MarkE wrote: >>> On 17/12/2024 6:33 am, Mark Isaak wrote: >>>> What makes you think that you know enough about the universe to >>>> think that the problems you put forward will not likewise be >>>> obviated by further research? >>> >>> I don't, not with certainty. Hence I put forward possible OoL >>> showstoppers for scrutiny. >>> >>> To that end, do you think the following recent examples have any >>> merit at all? I'm not asking if you agree that they're a problem, >>> rather, is there any legitimacy in addressing them as potentional >>> problems for OoL? >>> - the tar paradox >> >> Probably not a problem. It's easy to imagine mechanisms that could >> separate productive products from counterproductive ones. >> >>> - supply of concentrated nucleotides unbroken for millions of years >> >> A problem, yes, but only in the sense that solving any puzzle is a >> problem. A showstarter (where research is the show), not a >> showstopper. Also, millions of years may be unnecessary. I suspect >> that one bottleneck of abiogenesis is for the proper conditions to >> come together, but once they do, a huge step could be taken in months, >> perhaps hours. I might be completely wrong about that, but then, >> others might be wrong about thinking optimum conditions must persist >> for millions of years. >> > > It is difficult to quantify this time. That's the point. > An estimate of the minimal length of RNA required for self-replication > is 100 units: > [...] Which may not be relevant. The first replication might very well not be RNA. -- Mark Isaak "Wisdom begins when you discover the difference between 'That doesn't make sense' and 'I don't understand.'" - Mary Doria Russell