Path: ...!news.nobody.at!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Old Hardware
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 15:52:04 -0600
Organization: Modern Human
Message-ID: <vk24i4$1gl43$2@solani.org>
References: <pan$9505a$d037b8eb$bc31d320$63334f69@linux.rocks>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2024 21:52:04 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: solani.org;
	logging-data="1594499"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:pKxJIxaWBhdwyXK+oxGlTl+Kcl8=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <pan$9505a$d037b8eb$bc31d320$63334f69@linux.rocks>
X-User-ID: eJwNxkkBwDAIBEBLEJZLDiTgX0I7r1ExtuswNejq/kkPGp96LKy9xd7bWKczhXf9WuBQi85FCg8QVdY5FGkfUtwVag==
Bytes: 3218
Lines: 64

On 12/19/24 3:35 PM, Farley Flud wrote:
> I hear a lot of ignoramus assholes talk about how GNU/Linux is
> the savior of old, and obsolescent, hardware.
> 
> That certainly is true, but not how these assholes believe.
> 
> GNU/Linux can indeed accommodate any old hardware configuration,
> but don't expect the average distro to do it.
> 
> Example:
> 
> Let's say that you want floppy disk access.  Floppy disks have
> been obsolete for many, many years, but GNU/Linux can easily
> provide access.
> 
> But not through the average fucking distro!
> 
> To get floppy access, one has to go to kernel.org, which contains
> ALL the kernels since the very beginning, and find the last
> kernel version that has floppy drivers.  Then, the kernel has
> to compiled and installed.
> 
> Also, the repositories of GLIBC would have to be searched for an
> appropriate, if necessary, version to support floppy access.
> 
> Again, any software that may be relevant to floppy access would
> have to be acquired from the archives of said software.
> 
> In this way, a complete system that supports floppy disk access
> could be built.
> 
> GNU/Linux can support ALL hardware back to 1991 but the user has
> to be prepared to build the system.  No distro can do it.
> 
> What about Microslop Winblows?
> 
> Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!  That proprietary piece of junk can't
> support anything beyond yesterday.  (One of my client's scanners
> suddenly failed with one of their stupid updates.)
> 
> Microslop has no archives.  Such is never the way of commercial
> garbage.
> 
> Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
> 
>   



But what you say can be done with Linux can be done with Winblows 
machines too. Just install an earlier version of Winblows and do not 
update.

Which is simpler?

I have a Win10, a Win7, and a WinXP machine tightly stored away, but 
easily accessible just for the occasions that Linux cannot do the job. 
Do you know what those occasions are?... They're almost always occasions 
when I'm doing something sensitive and formal that have deadlines to 
them. That's when Linux fails. This is thanks to what people, Flud? 
Who's responsible for this?