Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: WM <wolfgang.mueckenheim@tha.de>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
 (extra-ordinary)
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 15:38:30 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 19
Message-ID: <vk3vh6$3g0a3$1@dont-email.me>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me> <vjf7kl$2s7e5$1@dont-email.me>
 <vjfmq3$2upa9$3@dont-email.me>
 <c6b624cb0b1b55d54aab969ee5b4e283ec7be3cd@i2pn2.org>
 <vjhp8b$3gjbv$1@dont-email.me>
 <dc9e7638be92c4d158f238f8c042c8559cd46521@i2pn2.org>
 <vjjg6p$3tvsg$1@dont-email.me>
 <c31edc62508876748c8cf69f93ab80c0a7fd84ac@i2pn2.org>
 <vjka3b$1tms$3@dont-email.me>
 <e11a34c507a23732d83e3d0fcde7b609cdaf3ade@i2pn2.org>
 <vjmse3$k2go$2@dont-email.me>
 <069069bf23698c157ddfd9b62b9b2f632b484c40@i2pn2.org>
 <vjooeq$11n0g$2@dont-email.me>
 <2d3620a6e2a8a57d9db7a33c9d476fe03cac455b@i2pn2.org>
 <vjrfcc$1m1b2$1@dont-email.me>
 <3c08ed64fa6193dc9ab6733b807a5c99a49810aa@i2pn2.org>
 <vjss56$1tr00$2@dont-email.me>
 <357a8740434fb6f1b847130ac3afbd33c850fc37@i2pn2.org>
 <vjv6fb$2dujf$2@dont-email.me>
 <b0c7449413fec43bc18e8d2d67da1c779a350bc2@i2pn2.org>
 <vk1cad$2srst$1@dont-email.me>
 <ceaaf003457afd2e381c8f115a4e691611162ffe@i2pn2.org>
 <vk3g0l$3cjvc$3@dont-email.me> <vk3lv1$3e9se$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2024 15:38:30 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="4714c2ad223c14e6576c99477efd2520";
	logging-data="3670339"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+oy8YmL2eTs+xE7DR8Z/uULt18cH1QN2w="
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Cancel-Lock: sha1:9DMVAhg8GCeFC/AdKVfwIpWi2B4=
Content-Language: en-US
In-Reply-To: <vk3lv1$3e9se$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2624

On 20.12.2024 12:55, Chris M. Thomasson wrote:
> On 12/20/2024 2:13 AM, WM wrote:
>> On 20.12.2024 03:52, Richard Damon wrote:
>>
>>> He builds an infinite sequence that pairs a natural number to every 
>>> rational number .
>>
>> And I build an infinite sequence of intervals [1, n] that contains 
>> every natural number.
> 
> Cantor Pairing works will any of them.

Therefore no interval [1, n] and therefore no n is missing in my proof 
that the pairing
10n --> n, n ∈ ℕ
does not work. For every interval at least 9/10 are missing.

Regards, WM